Literature DB >> 12807365

Assessing the economic impact of adverse drug effects.

Rosa Rodríguez-Monguió1, María José Otero, Joan Rovira.   

Abstract

Although most commonly used drugs cause adverse effects, some of them with potentially serious consequences, relatively little is known about their economic impact. The purpose of this review is to summarise information describing the cost of treatment of drug-induced adverse effects as an additional cost of pharmaceutical treatment. The focus of this study was limited to the overall economic impact of drug-related morbidity and to the economic analysis of a single class of drugs with different safety profiles. Several studies carried out in the US have investigated adverse drug effects experienced by hospitalised patients and their impact on hospital costs. Patients who developed adverse effects were hospitalised an average of 1.2-3.8 days longer than patients who did not, with additional hospital costs of $US2284-5640 per patient (2000 values). Other research studies in different countries have quantified the incidence and economic consequences of adverse drug effects that occur in the ambulatory setting and that generate hospital admission and emergency department visits. They have shown that preventable adverse effects constitute between 43.3% and 80% of all adverse outcomes leading to emergency visits and hospital admissions, and disproportionately increase healthcare costs. Finally, a recent estimation revealed that in the US the cost of problems linked to drug use in the ambulatory setting exceeded $US177 billion in the year 2000.NSAIDs constitute a widely used class of drugs and they are one of the leading drug classes in causing adverse effects. The acquisition costs of the drugs, as well as the costs for prevention and treatment of adverse effects, determine their cost-effectiveness ratio. Depending on the incidence and severity of adverse effects, the cost per adverse effect avoided ranges from $US215 to $US35 459 (2000 values). According to the contingent valuation methodology, willingness to pay to avoid or reduce the incidence of adverse effects is an indicator of the value individuals associate with the impact of such effects on their well-being. Individuals are willing to pay annually an average of $US240 and $US350, respectively, to avoid vomiting and gastrointestinal distress induced by NSAIDs. Although the results of the different studies reviewed are not strictly comparable because of differences in the severity of adverse effects, the perspective of the analysis, the cost data included and the cost component considered, the data show that, apart from the implications for health, a substantial quantity of resources are used to treat adverse effects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12807365     DOI: 10.2165/00019053-200321090-00002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics        ISSN: 1170-7690            Impact factor:   4.981


  56 in total

Review 1.  Is there scope for improving the cost-effective prescribing of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs?

Authors:  K Bloor; A Maynard
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  Analysis of the costs of NSAID-associated gastropathy. Experience in a US health maintenance organisation.

Authors:  R E Johnson; M C Hornbrook; R S Hooker; G T Woodson; R Shneidman
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 4.981

3.  Excess costs from gastrointestinal disease associated with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.

Authors:  W E Smalley; M R Griffin; R L Fought; W A Ray
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Costs of medical injuries in Utah and Colorado.

Authors:  E J Thomas; D M Studdert; J P Newhouse; B I Zbar; K M Howard; E J Williams; T A Brennan
Journal:  Inquiry       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 1.730

Review 5.  Drug-related problems in hospitalised patients.

Authors:  P M van den Bemt; T C Egberts; L T de Jong-van den Berg; J R Brouwers
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 5.606

6.  Omeprazole compared with misoprostol for ulcers associated with nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs. Omeprazole versus Misoprostol for NSAID-induced Ulcer Management (OMNIUM) Study Group.

Authors:  C J Hawkey; J A Karrasch; L Szczepañski; D G Walker; A Barkun; A J Swannell; N D Yeomans
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1998-03-12       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Frequency and cost of serious adverse drug reactions in a department of general medicine.

Authors:  N Moore; D Lecointre; C Noblet; M Mabille
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 4.335

8.  An economic model for determining the costs and consequences of using various treatment alternatives for the management of arthritis in Canada.

Authors:  R A Zabinski; T A Burke; J Johnson; F Lavoie; C Fitzsimon; R Tretiak; J V Chancellor
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 4.981

9.  Drug-related hospitalization at a tertiary teaching center in Lebanon: incidence, associations, and relation to self-medicating behavior.

Authors:  S Major; S Badr; L Bahlawan; G Hassan; T Khogaoghlanian; R Khalil; A Melhem; R Richani; F Younes; J Yeretzian; M Khogali; R Sabra
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 6.875

Review 10.  Is misoprostol cost-effective in the prevention of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug-induced gastropathy in patients with chronic arthritis? A review of conflicting economic evaluations.

Authors:  G Stucki; M Johannesson; M H Liang
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1994-09-26
View more
  43 in total

1.  Physicians' attitudes and adverse drug reaction reporting : a case-control study in Portugal.

Authors:  Maria T Herdeiro; Adolfo Figueiras; Jorge Polónia; Juan Jesus Gestal-Otero
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 5.606

2.  Measuring the value of public health systems: the disconnect between health economists and public health practitioners.

Authors:  Peter J Neumann; Peter D Jacobson; Jennifer A Palmer
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2008-10-15       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 3.  [Pharmacogenetics. Clinical relevance in anesthsiology].

Authors:  E M Zeidler; A E Goetz; C Zöllner
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 1.041

4.  The effect of pharmacist-led medication review in high-risk patients in the emergency department: an evaluation protocol.

Authors:  Corinne M Hohl; Kimberlyn McGrail; Boris Sobolev
Journal:  CMAJ Open       Date:  2015-01-13

5.  No medicine is sometimes the best medicine.

Authors:  Katharine Ann Wallis
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2015-05-14

6.  A framework for assessing the economic value of pharmacovigilance in low- and middle-income countries.

Authors:  Joseph B Babigumira; Andy Stergachis; Hye Lyn Choi; Alexander Dodoo; Jude Nwokike; Louis P Garrison
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 7.  How are the costs of drug-related morbidity measured?: a systematic literature review.

Authors:  Hanna Gyllensten; Anna K Jönsson; Clas Rehnberg; Anders Carlsten
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2012-03-01       Impact factor: 5.606

8.  Modelling drug-related morbidity in Sweden using an expert panel of physicians.

Authors:  Katja M Hakkarainen; Daniel Alström; Staffan Hägg; Anders Carlsten; Hanna Gyllensten
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2012-03-06       Impact factor: 2.953

Review 9.  Comparative epidemiology of hospital-acquired adverse drug reactions in adults and children and their impact on cost and hospital stay--a systematic review.

Authors:  Lateef Mohiuddin Khan
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2013-08-17       Impact factor: 2.953

10.  Adverse drug reactions as cause of admission to hospital: prospective analysis of 18 820 patients.

Authors:  Munir Pirmohamed; Sally James; Shaun Meakin; Chris Green; Andrew K Scott; Thomas J Walley; Keith Farrar; B Kevin Park; Alasdair M Breckenridge
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-07-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.