Literature DB >> 12807258

Antibiotic resistance analysis of fecal coliforms to determine fecal pollution sources in a mixed-use watershed.

Brian S Burnes1.   

Abstract

Antibiotic resistance analysis was performed on fecal coliform (FC) bacteria from a mixed-use watershed to determine the source, human or nonhuman, of fecal coliform contamination. The study consisted of discriminant analysis of antibiotic resistance patterns generated by exposure to four concentrations of six antibiotics (ampicillin, gentamicin sulfate, kanamycin, spectinomycin dihydrochloride, streptomycin sulfate, and tetracycline hydrochloride). A reference database was constructed from 1125 fecal coliform isolates from the following sources: humans, domestic animals (cats and dogs), agricultural animals (chickens, cattle, and horses), and wild animals. Based on similar antibiotic resistance patterns, cat and dog isolates were grouped as domestic animals and horse and cattle isolates were grouped as livestock. The resulting average rate of correct classification (ARCC) for human and nonhuman isolates was 94%. A total of 800 FC isolates taken from the watershed during either a dry event or a wet event were classified according to source. Human sources contribute a majority (> 50%) of the baseflow FC isolates found in the watershed in urbanized areas. Chicken and livestock sources are responsible for the majority of the baseflow FC isolates found in the rural reaches of the watershed. Stormwater introduces FC isolates from domestic (approximately 16%) and wild (approximately 21%) sources throughout the watershed and varying amounts (up to 60%) from chicken and livestock sources. These results suggest that antibiotic resistance patterns of FC may be used to determine sources of fecal contamination and aid in the direction of water quality improvement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12807258     DOI: 10.1023/a:1023357200980

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Monit Assess        ISSN: 0167-6369            Impact factor:   2.513


  7 in total

1.  Determining sources of fecal pollution in a rural Virginia watershed with antibiotic resistance patterns in fecal streptococci.

Authors:  C Hagedorn; S L Robinson; J R Filtz; S M Grubbs; T A Angier; R B Reneau
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Identification of nonpoint sources of fecal pollution in coastal waters by using host-specific 16S ribosomal DNA genetic markers from fecal anaerobes.

Authors:  A E Bernhard; K G Field
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Use of antibiotic resistance analysis to identify nonpoint sources of fecal pollution.

Authors:  B A Wiggins; R W Andrews; R A Conway; C L Corr; E J Dobratz; D P Dougherty; J R Eppard; S R Knupp; M C Limjoco; J M Mettenburg; J M Rinehardt; J Sonsino; R L Torrijos; M E Zimmerman
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Discriminant analysis of antibiotic resistance patterns in fecal streptococci, a method to differentiate human and animal sources of fecal pollution in natural waters.

Authors:  B A Wiggins
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 5.  Phenotypic identification of the genus Enterococcus and differentiation of phylogenetically distinct enterococcal species and species groups.

Authors:  L A Devriese; B Pot; M D Collins
Journal:  J Appl Bacteriol       Date:  1993-11

6.  Drug-resistant Salmonella from animals fed antimicrobials.

Authors:  S D Holmberg; M T Osterholm; K A Senger; M L Cohen
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1984-09-06       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Multiple antibiotic resistance indexing of Escherichia coli to identify high-risk sources of fecal contamination of foods.

Authors:  P H Krumperman
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1983-07       Impact factor: 4.792

  7 in total
  5 in total

1.  Fecal source tracking by antibiotic resistance analysis on a watershed exhibiting low resistance.

Authors:  Yolanda Olivas; Barton R Faulkner
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2007-06-12       Impact factor: 2.513

2.  Identification of source of faecal pollution of Tirumanimuttar River, Tamilnadu, India using microbial source tracking.

Authors:  Kasi Murugan; Perumal Prabhakaran; Saleh Al-Sohaibani; Kuppusamy Sekar
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2011-10-20       Impact factor: 2.513

3.  Sample size, library composition, and genotypic diversity among natural populations of Escherichia coli from different animals influence accuracy of determining sources of fecal pollution.

Authors:  LeeAnn K Johnson; Mary B Brown; Ethan A Carruthers; John A Ferguson; Priscilla E Dombek; Michael J Sadowsky
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Antimicrobial Resistance in Escherichia coli and Enterococcal Isolates From Irrigation Return Flows in a High-Desert Watershed.

Authors:  Robert S Dungan; David L Bjorneberg
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 5.640

5.  Demographic and ecological risk factors for human influenza A virus infections in rural Indonesia.

Authors:  Elisabeth Dowling Root; Dwi Agustian; Cissy Kartasasmita; Timothy M Uyeki; Eric A F Simões
Journal:  Influenza Other Respir Viruses       Date:  2017-08-09       Impact factor: 4.380

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.