Literature DB >> 12807189

Phylogenetic relationships between Bacillus species and related genera inferred from comparison of 3' end 16S rDNA and 5' end 16S-23S ITS nucleotide sequences.

Dong Xu1, Jean-Charles Côté1.   

Abstract

The nucleotide sequences of the 3' end of the 16S rDNA and the 16S-23S internal transcribed spacer (ITS) of 40 Bacillaceae species were determined. These included 21 Bacillus, 9 Paenibacillus, 6 Brevibacillus, 2 Geobacillus, 1 Marinibacillus and 1 Virgibacillus species. Comparative sequence analysis of a 220 bp region covering a highly conserved 150 bp sequence located at the 3' end of the 16S rRNA coding region and a conserved 70 bp sequence located at the 5' end of the 16S-23S ITS of the 40 species and six sequences available in GenBank were used to infer the phylogenetic relationships between all 46 taxa. When a maximal distance (D(max), where D refers to the number of nucleotide substitutions per site) of 0.31 was introduced as a threshold to determine groupings, 10 phylogenetically distinct clusters were revealed. Twenty-six Bacillus species were separated in seven groups (I, II, III, IV, V, VI and X), but Bacillus circulans remained ungrouped. All six Brevibacillus species under study were in Group VII. The nine Paenibacillus species fell into two distinct groups (VIII and IX). Species with D(max) values within 0.05 were considered to be very closely related. These were Bacillus psychrophilus and Bacillus psychrosaccharolyticus in Group II; 'Bacillus maroccanus' and Bacillus simplex in Group II; Bacillus amyloliquefaciens, Bacillus atrophaeus, Bacillus mojavensis and Bacillus subtilis in Group VI; Bacillus fusiformis and Bacillus sphaericus in Group VI; Brevibacillus brevis and Brevibacillus formosus in Group VII; Paenibacillus gordonae and Paenibacillus validus in Group VIII; and Bacillus anthracis, Bacillus cereus, Bacillus mycoides and Bacillus thuringiensis in Group X. The phylogenetic classification presented here is, in general, in agreement with current classifications based on phenotypic and molecular data. Our findings suggest, however, that in some cases, further divisions or, conversely, further groupings might be warranted. Should current classifications be re-examined in the light of our results, D(max) values of 0.31 and 0.05, as exemplified here, may prove useful threshold values for the grouping of Bacillaceae into taxa akin to genera and species, respectively. These D(max) thresholds may also reveal, in a different way, bacterial species for which further characterization might be warranted for proper classification and/or reassignment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12807189     DOI: 10.1099/ijs.0.02346-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Syst Evol Microbiol        ISSN: 1466-5026            Impact factor:   2.747


  42 in total

1.  Reassessment of sequence-based targets for identification of bacillus species.

Authors:  K S Blackwood; C Y Turenne; D Harmsen; A M Kabani
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Phylogenetic Profiling and Diversity of Bacterial Communities in the Death Valley, an Extreme Habitat in the Atacama Desert.

Authors:  Francine Piubeli; María de Lourdes Moreno; Luciano Takeshi Kishi; Flavio Henrique-Silva; María Teresa García; Encarnación Mellado
Journal:  Indian J Microbiol       Date:  2015-06-23       Impact factor: 2.461

3.  Isolation, evaluation and characterization of Bacillus subtilis from cotton rhizospheric soil with biocontrol activity against Fusarium oxysporum.

Authors:  Archana Gajbhiye; Alok R Rai; Sudhir U Meshram; A B Dongre
Journal:  World J Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2009-12-30       Impact factor: 3.312

4.  Inactivation of Bacillus endospores in envelopes by electron beam irradiation.

Authors:  Shannon L Helfinstine; Carlos Vargas-Aburto; Roberto M Uribe; Christopher J Woolverton
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Measuring species richness based on microbial community fingerprints: the emperor has no clothes.

Authors:  Stephen J Bent; Jacob D Pierson; Larry J Forney; R Danovaro; G M Luna; A Dell'anno; B Pietrangeli
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Evidences for antioxidant response and biosorption potential of Bacillus simplex strain 115 against lead.

Authors:  Anissa Chamekh; Oussema Kharbech; Rim Driss-Limam; Cheima Fersi; Mohamed Khouatmeya; Rakia Chouari
Journal:  World J Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2021-02-06       Impact factor: 3.312

7.  Identifying experimental surrogates for Bacillus anthracis spores: a review.

Authors:  David L Greenberg; Joseph D Busch; Paul Keim; David M Wagner
Journal:  Investig Genet       Date:  2010-09-01

8.  Complete genome sequence of the mosquitocidal bacterium Bacillus sphaericus C3-41 and comparison with those of closely related Bacillus species.

Authors:  Xiaomin Hu; Wei Fan; Bei Han; Haizhou Liu; Dasheng Zheng; Qibin Li; Wei Dong; Jianping Yan; Meiying Gao; Colin Berry; Zhiming Yuan
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2008-02-22       Impact factor: 3.490

9.  Pathogenic Bacillus anthracis in the progressive gene losses and gains in adaptive evolution.

Authors:  G X Yu
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-01-30       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Phylogeny in aid of the present and novel microbial lineages: diversity in Bacillus.

Authors:  Shalini Porwal; Sadhana Lal; Simrita Cheema; Vipin Chandra Kalia
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-02-12       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.