Literature DB >> 12806017

Piscivores, trophic cascades, and lake management.

Ray W Drenner1, K David Hambright.   

Abstract

The concept of cascading trophic interactions predicts that an increase in piscivore biomass in lakes will result in decreased planktivorous fish biomass, increased herbivorous zooplankton biomass, and decreased phytoplankton biomass. Though often accepted as a paradigm in the ecological literature and adopted by lake managers as a basis for lake management strategies, the trophic cascading interactions hypothesis has not received the unequivocal support (in the form of rigorous experimental testing) that might be expected of a paradigm. Here we review field experiments and surveys, testing the hypothesis that effects of increasing piscivore biomass will cascade down through the food web yielding a decline in phytoplankton biomass. We found 39 studies in the scientific literature examining piscivore effects on phytoplankton biomass. Of the studies, 22 were confounded by supplemental manipulations (e.g., simultaneous reduction of nutrients or removal of planktivores) and could not be used to assess piscivore effects. Of the 17 nonconfounded studies, most did not find piscivore effects on phytoplankton biomass and therefore did not support the trophic cascading interactions hypothesis. However, the trophic cascading interactions hypothesis also predicts that lake systems containing piscivores will have lower phytoplankton biomass for any given phosphorus concentration. Based on regression analyses of chlorophyll-total phosphorus relationships in the 17 nonconfounded piscivore studies, this aspect of the trophic cascading interactions hypothesis was supported. The slope of the chlorophyll vs. total phosphorus regression was lower in lakes with planktivores and piscivores compared with lakes containing only planktivores but no piscivores. We hypothesize that this slope can be used as an indicator of "functional piscivory" and that communities with extremes of functional piscivory (zero and very high) represent classical 3- and 4-trophic level food webs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12806017      PMCID: PMC6009346          DOI: 10.1100/tsw.2002.138

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal        ISSN: 1537-744X


  3 in total

Review 1.  All wet or dried up? Real differences between aquatic and terrestrial food webs.

Authors:  Jonathan B Shurin; Daniel S Gruner; Helmut Hillebrand
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2006-01-07       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Physicochemical Process, Crustacean, and Microcystis Biomass Changes In Situ Enclosure after Introduction of Silver Carp at Meiliang Bay, Lake Taihu.

Authors:  Chengjie Yin; Longgen Guo; Chunlong Yi; Congqiang Luo; Leyi Ni
Journal:  Scientifica (Cairo)       Date:  2017-01-05

3.  Cryptic population dynamics: rapid evolution masks trophic interactions.

Authors:  Takehito Yoshida; Stephen P Ellner; Laura E Jones; Brendan J M Bohannan; Richard E Lenski; Nelson G Hairston
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 8.029

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.