Literature DB >> 12804725

Value of definitive diagnostic testing in the evaluation of patients presenting to the emergency department with chest pain.

Abu Shoyeb1, Sabahat Bokhari, Jennifer Sullivan, Eileen Hurley, Bernadette Miesner, Raffaela Pia, James Giglio, Osman R Sayan, Lucy Soto, Simbo Chiadika, Cristina LaMarca, LeRoy E Rabbani, Steven R Bergmann.   

Abstract

The optimal diagnostic evaluation of patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with chest pain but without myocardial infarction or unstable angina is controversial. We performed a prospective, nonrandomized, observational study of 1,195 consecutive patients presenting to the ED with chest pain but who had normal or nondiagnostic electrocardiograms and negative cardiac biomarkers. Patients (mean +/- SD age 61 +/- 15 years; 55% women) were admitted to the hospital and a standard protocol for evaluation and treatment was suggested. The use of stress myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) or cardiac catheterization during their index hospitalization, and the 3-month incidence of coronary angiography, percutaneous cardiac intervention, coronary artery bypass surgery, re-presentation to our institution's ED for chest pain, myocardial infarction, or death were followed. Five hundred nine of 1,195 patients (43%) underwent provocative stress MPI during their index hospitalization; 37% had perfusion defects (predominantly ischemia). Fifty-six of 1,195 patients (4%) underwent cardiac catheterization without stress MPI for their primary diagnostic evaluation. Six hundred thirty of 1,195 patients (53%) had neither MPI or cardiac catheterization during their index hospitalization. During the 3-month follow-up period, patients with a normal stress perfusion study during their index hospitalization had fewer return visits (4%) compared with patients with abnormal perfusion studies (19%), those who underwent catheterization directly (16%), or patients with no initial diagnostic evaluation (15%) (p <0.001). In addition, patients who had a diagnostic evaluation during their index hospitalization had a lower incidence of either acute myocardial infarction (0.9% vs 2.1%) or death (0.4% vs 3.0%, p <0.001) in the 3-month follow-up period. Accordingly, we strongly advocate provocative stress MPI early after presentation for chest pain in all patients with risk factors for coronary artery disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12804725     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9149(03)00390-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  4 in total

1.  Myocardial perfusion imaging with adenosine triphosphate predicts the rate of cardiovascular events.

Authors:  Isabel Coma-Canella; Jorge Palazuelos; Nieves Bravo; María José García Velloso
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2006 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 2.  Noninvasive cardiac imaging in suspected acute coronary syndrome.

Authors:  Pankaj Garg; S Richard Underwood; Roxy Senior; John P Greenwood; Sven Plein
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2016-02-25       Impact factor: 32.419

3.  Quick identification of acute chest pain patients study (QICS).

Authors:  Hendrik M Willemsen; Gonda de Jong; René A Tio; Wybe Nieuwland; Ido P Kema; Iwan C C van der Horst; Mattijs Oudkerk; Felix Zijlstra
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2009-06-15       Impact factor: 2.298

4.  Differences in diagnostic evaluation and clinical outcomes in the care of patients with chest pain based on admitting service: the benefits of a dedicated chest pain unit.

Authors:  Nir N Somekh; Maurice Rachko; Gregg Husk; Patricia Friedmann; Steven R Bergmann
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2008 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.872

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.