Literature DB >> 12804481

Surgery for morbid obesity.

J Colquitt1, A Clegg, M Sidhu, P Royle.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Obesity is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Surgery for morbid obesity may be considered when other conventional measures have failed, and a number of procedures are available. However, the effects of these surgical procedures compared with medical management and with each other are uncertain.
OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects of surgery for morbid obesity on weight, comorbidities and quality of life. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (issue 4, 2001), Medline (SilverPlatter) up to 2001, PubMed (Internet) 01/01/01-19/10/01, Embase (SilverPlatter) up to 09/2001, PsychINFO up to 10/2001, CINAHL (SilverPlatter) up to 07/2001, Science and Social Sciences Citation Index up to 10/12001, British Nursing Index up to 07/2001, Web of Science Proceedings up to 06/2001, BIOSIS up to10/2001, AMED up to 07/2001, National Research Register (issue 2, 2001), reference lists of relevant articles, and handsearched relevant journals. We also contacted experts in the field. Date of the most recent searches: October 2001. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials comparing different surgical procedures, and randomised controlled trials and non-randomised controlled trials comparing surgery with non-surgical management for morbid obesity. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Data were extracted by one reviewer and checked independently by two reviewers. Two reviewers independently assessed trial quality. MAIN
RESULTS: 18 trials involving 1891 people were included. One randomised controlled trial and one non-randomised controlled trial compared surgery with non-surgical management, and 11 randomised controlled trials compared different surgical procedures. The overall quality of the trials was variable, with just one trial having adequate allocation concealment. A meta-analysis was not possible due to differences in the surgical procedures performed, measures of weight change and length of follow-up. Compared with conventional management, surgery resulted in greater weight loss (23-28 kg more weight loss at two years), with improvements in quality of life and comorbidities. Some complications of surgery occurred, such as wound infection. Gastric bypass was associated with greater weight loss and fewer revisions, reoperations and/or conversions than gastroplasty, but had more side-effects. Greater weight loss and fewer side-effects and reoperations occurred with adjustable gastric banding than vertical banded gastroplasty, while vertical banded gastroplasty was associated with greater weight loss but more vomiting than horizontal gastroplasty. Some postoperative deaths occurred in the studies. Weight loss was similar between open and laparoscopic procedures. Fewer serious complications occurred with laparoscopic surgery. Laparoscopic surgery had a longer operative time, but resulted in reduced blood loss, reduced proportion of patients requiring intensive care unit stay, reduced length of hospital stay, reduced days to return to activities of daily living and reduced days to return to work. REVIEWER'S
CONCLUSIONS: The limited evidence suggests that surgery is more effective than conventional management for weight loss in morbid obesity. The comparative safety and effectiveness of different surgical procedures is unclear.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12804481     DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003641

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev        ISSN: 1361-6137


  20 in total

1.  Safety, efficacy, and cost-effectiveness of common laparoscopic procedures.

Authors:  Manish M Tiwari; Jason F Reynoso; Robin High; Albert W Tsang; Dmitry Oleynikov
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-10-07       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  [Plastic surgical considerations of conservative weight loss in the treatment of morbid obesity].

Authors:  M Mattesich; H Piza-Katzer
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 3.  Treating obesity in individuals and populations.

Authors:  Anjali Jain
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2005-12-10

Review 4.  [Evidential basis in bariatric surgery].

Authors:  M K Müller; S Wildi; P-A Clavien; M Weber
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 0.955

5.  Paid work increases and state benefit claims decrease after bariatric surgery.

Authors:  Simon C Hawkins; Alan Osborne; Ian G Finlay; Swethan Alagaratnam; Janet R Edmond; Richard Welbourn
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 4.129

Review 6.  Effects of weight loss on bone status after bariatric surgery: association between adipokines and bone markers.

Authors:  Hélène Wucher; Cécile Ciangura; Christine Poitou; Sébastien Czernichow
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2007-12-11       Impact factor: 4.129

7.  Gastric bypass surgery does not increase susceptibility to Helicobacter pylori infection in the stomach of rat or mouse.

Authors:  Björn Stenström; Kirsti Løseth; Lars Bevanger; Erik Sturegård; Torkel Wadström; Duan Chen
Journal:  Inflammopharmacology       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 4.473

8.  Intragastric injection of botulinum toxin A for the treatment of obesity.

Authors:  Reinhard Mittermair; Christian Keller; John Geibel
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 4.129

9.  Capacity for physical activity predicts weight loss after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.

Authors:  Ida J Hatoum; Heather K Stein; Benjamin F Merrifield; Lee M Kaplan
Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)       Date:  2008-11-06       Impact factor: 5.002

10.  Safety, feasibility and weight loss after transoral gastroplasty: First human multicenter study.

Authors:  J Devière; G Ojeda Valdes; L Cuevas Herrera; J Closset; O Le Moine; P Eisendrath; C Moreno; S Dugardeyn; M Barea; R de la Torre; S Edmundowicz; S Scott
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-11-01       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.