Literature DB >> 12803965

Effects of form familiarity on perception of words, pseudowords, and nonwords in the two cerebral hemispheres.

Timothy R Jordan1, Michelle Redwood, Geoffrey R Patching.   

Abstract

Previous investigations of hemispheric processes of word perception provide a mixed picture of the sensitivity of each hemisphere to the familiarity of the visual form of lateralized displays. We investigated this issue by presenting words, pseudowords, and nonwords briefly to either the left (LH) or right (RH) hemisphere in lowercase, uppercase, and a matched, unfamiliar mixed-case form, and used an eye tracker to ensure central fixation and the Reicher-Wheeler task to suppress influences of stimulus asymmetry. Familiarity of form exerted a substantial effect on perception. In particular, perception of LH and RH displays of words, pseudowords, and nonwords was least accurate for mixed case, intermediate for upper case, and most accurate for lowercase. However, form had no effect on the LH advantage observed for words, pseudowords, and nonwords, indicating that form affected processing in both hemispheres to a similar extent. Moreover, LH and RH displays both showed that mixed case disrupted performance most for words, and more for pseudowords than for nonwords, indicating the sensitivity to form shown by each hemisphere reflected more than a general perceptual process. Implications for the role of form familiarity in hemispheric processing of words are discussed.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12803965     DOI: 10.1162/089892903321662921

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 0898-929X            Impact factor:   3.225


  8 in total

1.  Assessing the role of different spatial frequencies in word perception by good and poor readers.

Authors:  Geoffrey R Patching; Timothy R Jordan
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2005-09

2.  Reevaluating split-fovea processing in word recognition: hemispheric dominance, retinal location, and the word-nonword effect.

Authors:  Timothy R Jordan; Kevin B Paterson; Stoyan Kurtev
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 3.282

3.  Hemispheric differences in orthographic and semantic processing as revealed by event-related potentials.

Authors:  Danielle S Dickson; Kara D Federmeier
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2014-09-30       Impact factor: 3.139

4.  The last course of coarse coding: Hemispheric similarities in associative and categorical semantic processing.

Authors:  Emily N Mech; Padmapriya Kandhadai; Kara D Federmeier
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2022-04-20       Impact factor: 2.781

5.  On the functional neuroanatomy of visual word processing: effects of case and letter deviance.

Authors:  Martin Kronbichler; Johannes Klackl; Fabio Richlan; Matthias Schurz; Wolfgang Staffen; Gunther Ladurner; Heinz Wimmer
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Evaluating effects of divided hemispheric processing on word recognition in foveal and extrafoveal displays: the evidence from Arabic.

Authors:  Abubaker A A Almabruk; Kevin B Paterson; Victoria McGowan; Timothy R Jordan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-04-29       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  What's in a Typeface? Evidence of the Existence of Print Personalities in Arabic.

Authors:  Timothy R Jordan; Alya S AlShamsi; Hajar A K Yekani; Maryam AlJassmi; Nada Al Dosari; Ehab W Hermena; Mercedes Sheen
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-10-18

8.  Seeing Inscriptions on the Shroud of Turin: The Role of Psychological Influences in the Perception of Writing.

Authors:  Timothy R Jordan; Mercedes Sheen; Lily Abedipour; Kevin B Paterson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.