Literature DB >> 12803591

Influences on serum concentrations of morphine, M6G and M3G during routine clinical drug monitoring: a prospective survey in 300 adult cancer patients.

P Klepstad1, O Dale, S Kaasa, K Zahlsen, T Aamo, P Fayers, P C Borchgrevink.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In order to make treatment decisions physicians should have knowledge about the relations between patient characteristics and drug disposition. Dose, route of administration, gender, age and renal function are reported to influence the serum concentrations of morphine, morphine-6-glucurnide (M6G) and morphine-3-glucuronide (M3G) during chronic treatment of cancer pain. These factors, however, are not evaluated in studies with a sample size sufficient to explore predictive factors.
METHODS: Three hundred consecutive morphine users admitted because of a malignant disease were recruited. The relations of serum concentrations of morphine, M6G and M3G to patient characteristics (gender, age, weight, renal function, liver function, dose, route of administration) were explored, and regression analysis performed to investigate whether these characteristics predicted serum concentrations obtained during routine clinical drug monitoring.
RESULTS: Morphine dose was associated with serum concentrations of morphine (r = 0.69), M6G (r = 0.76) and M3G (r = 0.76). Oral morphine resulted in higher dose-adjusted M6G and M3G serum concentrations compared with s.c. morphine. Creatinine serum concentrations correlated with serum concentrations of M6G and M3G. Dose and route of administration predicted morphine serum concentrations, while dose and renal function predicted M6G and M3G serum concentrations. Age was an additional factor predicting M3G concentrations. Dose was the only factor that explained a clinically significant part of the observed variability.
CONCLUSION: Patient characteristics predict only minor parts of the variability of morphine, M3G and M6G serum concentrations observed during routine clinical drug-monitoring in cancer patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12803591     DOI: 10.1034/j.1399-6576.2003.00138.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand        ISSN: 0001-5172            Impact factor:   2.105


  14 in total

Review 1.  [Do opioids induce hyperalgesia?].

Authors:  C Zöllner
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 1.041

Review 2.  Candidate gene polymorphisms predicting individual sensitivity to opioids.

Authors:  Shinya Kasai; Masakazu Hayashida; Ichiro Sora; Kazutaka Ikeda
Journal:  Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol       Date:  2007-11-13       Impact factor: 3.000

3.  Mice lacking multidrug resistance protein 3 show altered morphine pharmacokinetics and morphine-6-glucuronide antinociception.

Authors:  Noam Zelcer; Koen van de Wetering; Michel Hillebrand; Elise Sarton; Annemieke Kuil; Peter R Wielinga; Thomas Tephly; Albert Dahan; Jos H Beijnen; Piet Borst
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-05-10       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Opioid needs of terminally ill patients with gynecologic malignancies.

Authors:  Fumi Utsumi; Hiroaki Kajiyama; Jun Sakata; Makiko Higashi; Kaoru Niimi; Ryuichiro Sekiya; Hiroko Mitsui; Shiro Suzuki; Tomokazu Umezu; Mika Mizuno; Eiko Yamamoto; Kiyosumi Shibata; Fumitaka Kikkawa
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-06-07       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 5.  Biological pathways and genetic variables involved in pain.

Authors:  Qiuling Shi; Charles S Cleeland; Pål Klepstad; Christine Miaskowski; Nancy L Pedersen
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2010-09-15       Impact factor: 4.147

6.  Using group-based trajectory modeling to examine heterogeneity of symptom burden in patients with head and neck cancer undergoing aggressive non-surgical therapy.

Authors:  Qiuling Shi; Tito R Mendoza; G Brandon Gunn; Xin Shelley Wang; David I Rosenthal; Charles S Cleeland
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2013-03-09       Impact factor: 4.147

7.  Effects of μ-opioid receptor modulation on the hippocampal network activity of sharp wave and ripples.

Authors:  Panagiotis Giannopoulos; Costas Papatheodoropoulos
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 8.739

8.  QLU-C10D: a health state classification system for a multi-attribute utility measure based on the EORTC QLQ-C30.

Authors:  M T King; D S J Costa; N K Aaronson; J E Brazier; D F Cella; P M Fayers; P Grimison; M Janda; G Kemmler; R Norman; A S Pickard; D Rowen; G Velikova; T A Young; R Viney
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2016-01-20       Impact factor: 4.147

9.  Influences on the pharmacokinetics of oxycodone: a multicentre cross-sectional study in 439 adult cancer patients.

Authors:  Trine Naalsund Andreassen; Pål Klepstad; Andrew Davies; Kristin Bjordal; Staffan Lundström; Stein Kaasa; Ola Dale
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2010-12-08       Impact factor: 2.953

10.  Day-to-day variations during clinical drug monitoring of morphine, morphine-3-glucuronide and morphine-6-glucuronide serum concentrations in cancer patients. A prospective observational study.

Authors:  Pål Klepstad; Priscilla Hilton; Jorunn Moen; Stein Kaasa; Petter C Borchgrevink; Kolbjørn Zahlsen; Ola Dale
Journal:  BMC Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2004-10-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.