Literature DB >> 1280309

Intelligibility assessment in developmental phonological disorders: accuracy of caregiver gloss.

J Kwiatkowski1, L D Shriberg.   

Abstract

Fifteen caregivers each glossed a simultaneously videotaped and audiotaped sample of their child with speech delay engaged in conversation with a clinician. One of the authors generated a reference gloss for each sample, aided by (a) prior knowledge of the child's speech-language status and error patterns, (b) glosses from the child's clinician and the child's caregiver, (c) unlimited replays of the taped sample, and (d) the information gained from completing a narrow phonetic transcription of the sample. Caregivers glossed an average of 78% of the utterances and 81% of the words. A comparison of their glosses to the reference glosses suggested that they accurately understood an average of 58% of the utterances and 73% of the words. Discussion considers the implications of such findings for methodological and theoretical issues underlying children's moment-to-moment intelligibility breakdowns during speech-language processing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1280309     DOI: 10.1044/jshr.3505.1095

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Speech Hear Res        ISSN: 0022-4685


  3 in total

1.  Language Sampling for Preschoolers With Severe Speech Impairments.

Authors:  Cathy Binger; Jamie Ragsdale; Aimee Bustos
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2016-11-01       Impact factor: 2.408

2.  The Relationship Between Single-Word Speech Severity and Intelligibility in Childhood Apraxia of Speech.

Authors:  Karen V Chenausky; Danielle Gagné; Kaila L Stipancic; Aaron Shield; Jordan R Green
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2022-02-08       Impact factor: 2.674

3.  Measuring Speech Comprehensibility in Students with Down Syndrome.

Authors:  Paul J Yoder; Tiffany Woynaroski; Stephen Camarata
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2016-06-01       Impact factor: 2.297

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.