Literature DB >> 12802611

The correlation of preoperative CT, MR imaging, and clinical staging (FIGO) with histopathology findings in primary cervical carcinoma.

O Ozsarlak1, W Tjalma, E Schepens, B Corthouts, B Op de Beeck, E Van Marck, P M Parizel, A M De Schepper.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare the preoperative findings of abdominal/pelvic CT and MRI with the preoperative clinical International Federation of Obstetrics and Gynecology (FIGO) staging and postoperative pathology report in patients with primary cancer of the cervix. Thirty-six patients with surgical-pathological proven primary cancer of the cervix were retrospectively studied for preoperative staging by clinical examination, CT, and MR imaging. Studied parameters for preoperative staging were the presence of tumor, tumor extension into the parametrial tissue, pelvic wall, adjacent organs, and lymph nodes. The CT was performed in 32 patients and MRI (T1- and T2-weighted images) in 29 patients. The CT and MR staging were based on the FIGO staging system. Results were compared with histological findings. The group is consisted of stage 0 (in situ):1, Ia:1, Ib:8, IIa:2, IIb:12, IIIa:4, IVa:6, and IVb:2 patients. The overall accuracy of staging for clinical examination, CT, and MRI was 47, 53, and 86%, respectively. The MRI incorrectly staged 2 patients and did not visualize only two tumors; one was an in situ (stage-0) and one stage-Ia (microscopic) disease. The MRI is more accurate than CT and they are both superior to clinical examination in evaluating the locoregional extension and preoperative staging of primary cancer of the cervix.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12802611     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-003-1928-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  17 in total

1.  Negative MRI findings with invasive cervical biopsy may indicate stage IA cervical carcinoma.

Authors:  K Fujiwara; E Yoden; T Asakawa; M Shimizu; M Hirokawa; Y Mikami; T Oda; I Joja; Y Imajo; I Kohno
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 5.482

2.  [Invasive cervix carcinoma (pT2b-pT4a). Value of conventional and pharmacokinetic magnetic resonance tomography (MRI) in comparison with extensive cross sections and histopathologic findings].

Authors:  H Hawighorst; P G Knapstein; W Weikel; M V Knopp; U Schaeffer; M Essig; G Brix; I Zuna; S Schönberg; G van Kaick
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 0.635

3.  High-resolution MR imaging of stage I cervical neoplasia with a dedicated transvaginal coil: MR features and correlation of imaging and pathologic findings.

Authors:  N M deSouza; D Scoones; T Krausz; D J Gilderdale; W P Soutter
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 3.959

4.  New gynecologic cancer staging.

Authors:  W T Creasman
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 5.482

Review 5.  The role of MR imaging in invasive cervical carcinoma.

Authors:  E A Boss; J O Barentsz; L F Massuger; H Boonstra
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Preoperative staging of cervical carcinoma with MR imaging: a reappraisal of diagnostic accuracy and pitfalls.

Authors:  M H Sheu; C Y Chang; J H Wang; M S Yen
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Fast dynamic contrast enhanced MR imaging of cervical carcinoma.

Authors:  P B Van Vierzen; L F Massuger; S H Ruys; J O Barentsz
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 2.350

8.  Cervical carcinoma: can dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging help predict tumor aggressiveness?

Authors:  S Postema; P M Pattynama; C S van Rijswijk; J B Trimbos
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Carcinoma of the cervix: staging with MR imaging.

Authors:  K Togashi; K Nishimura; T Sagoh; S Minami; S Noma; I Fujisawa; Y Nakano; J Konishi; H Ozasa; I Konishi
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Cervical carcinoma: do fast SE and fat suppression techniques improve MR tumor staging at 0.5 T?

Authors:  S Postema; L A Peters; J Hermans; J B Trimbos; P M Pattynama
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  1996 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.826

View more
  17 in total

1.  Staging of uterine cervical cancer with MRI: guidelines of the European Society of Urogenital Radiology.

Authors:  Corinne Balleyguier; E Sala; T Da Cunha; A Bergman; B Brkljacic; F Danza; R Forstner; B Hamm; R Kubik-Huch; C Lopez; R Manfredi; J McHugo; L Oleaga; K Togashi; K Kinkel
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-11-10       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Efficacy of transvaginal contrast-enhanced MRI in the early staging of cervical carcinoma.

Authors:  Deniz Akata; Ulku Kerimoglu; Tuncay Hazirolan; Musturay Karcaaltincaba; Faruk Köse; Mustafa N Ozmen; Okan Akhan
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-01-27       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Cervical cancer: MR imaging findings before, during, and after radiation therapy.

Authors:  Gulgun Engin
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-06-14       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Role of computed tomography (CT) scan in staging of cervical carcinoma.

Authors:  T V Prasad; S Thulkar; S Hari; D N Sharma; S Kumar
Journal:  Indian J Med Res       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 2.375

5.  Volume Measurement by Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in Cervical Cancer.

Authors:  Shinya Fujii; Naoki Iwata; Chie Inoue; Naoko Mukuda; Takeru Fukunaga; Toshihide Ogawa
Journal:  Yonago Acta Med       Date:  2017-06-26       Impact factor: 1.641

6.  Comparison between readout-segmented and single-shot echo-planar imaging in the evaluation of cervical cancer staging.

Authors:  Weiliang Qian; Qian Chen; Zhongshuai Zhang; Hong Wang; Jibin Zhang; Jianming Xu
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 3.039

7.  Accuracy of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in the detection of lymph node involvement in cervix carcinoma.

Authors:  Massimo Bellomi; Guido Bonomo; Fabio Landoni; Gaetano Villa; Maria E Leon; Luca Bocciolone; Angelo Maggioni; Giuseppe Viale
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-07-06       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Apparent diffusion coefficient in cervical cancer of the uterus: comparison with the normal uterine cervix.

Authors:  Shinji Naganawa; Chiho Sato; Hisashi Kumada; Takeo Ishigaki; Shunichi Miura; Osamu Takizawa
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2004-11-05       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Localized cervical cancer (stage <IIB): accuracy of MR imaging in planning less extensive surgery.

Authors:  R Manfredi; B Gui; A Giovanzana; S Marini; M Di Stefano; G Zannoni; G Scambia; L Bonomo
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2009-05-14       Impact factor: 3.469

10.  Lymph Node Staging with a Combined Protocol of 18F-FDG PET/MRI and Sentinel Node SPECT/CT: A Prospective Study in Patients with FIGO I/II Cervical Carcinoma.

Authors:  Matthias Weissinger; Florin-Andrei Taran; Sergios Gatidis; Stefan Kommoss; Konstantin Nikolaou; Samine Sahbai; Christian la Fougère; Sara Yvonne Brucker; Helmut Dittmann
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2021-01-28       Impact factor: 10.057

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.