Literature DB >> 12802005

Atrial septal defects in pediatric patients: noninvasive sizing with cardiovascular MR imaging.

Philipp Beerbaum1, Hermann Körperich, Hermann Esdorn, Ute Blanz, Peter Barth, Johannes Hartmann, Jürgen Gieseke, Hans Meyer.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate phase-contrast magnetic resonance (MR) imaging for sizing of secundum atrial septal defects (ASDs) and inflow MR angiography for detection of associated venous anomalies in pediatric patients with inconclusive transthoracic echocardiographic (TTE) results.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty-five children (mean age, 5.4 years +/- 2.7 [SD]) with ASD and inconclusive TTE results underwent phase-contrast MR imaging. Defect size and rim distances measured on MR imaging sections obtained in the ASD plane and from the defect to the venae cavae, aortic root, and atrioventricular valves were compared with transesophageal echocardiographic (TEE) findings (n = 30) during transcatheter closure or surgical measurements (n = 40) by using Bland-Altman analysis. Inflow MR angiography was compared with invasive cine angiocardiography for detection of associated venous anomalies.
RESULTS: For ASD size, mean differences were less than 1 mm between MR imaging and TEE measurements (with upper and lower limits of agreement between 2.3 and -3.3 mm) and were between 1.2 and -1.6 mm between MR imaging and surgical measurements (with upper and lower limits of agreement between 4.7 and -5.2 mm). Septal rim measurements at MR imaging agreed fairly well with TEE and surgical results. Septal length was overestimated at MR imaging versus TEE (mean difference, 3.0 mm; upper and lower limits of agreement, between 8.0 and -2.8 mm), but MR imaging septal length measurements agreed with surgical results. Rim distance to coronary sinus was difficult to assess. MR imaging enabled referral of 25 of 30 patients for successful transcatheter closure; five patients were found to have too large defects after balloon sizing. Multiple ASDs and/or associated vascular anomalies in 17 of 65 patients were clearly identified at MR imaging, compared with results of TEE, surgery, and cardiac catheterization.
CONCLUSION: In children with ASD and inconclusive TTE results, MR imaging can enable determination of defect size, rim distances to adjacent structures, and venous connections. Copyright RSNA, 2003.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12802005     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2282020798

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  10 in total

Review 1.  Evaluation of intracardiac shunts with cardiac magnetic resonance.

Authors:  Patrick M Colletti
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 2.931

2.  Three-dimensional, isotropic MRI: a unified approach to quantification and visualization in congenital heart disease.

Authors:  Thomas Sangild Sørensen; Philipp Beerbaum; Hermann Körperich; Erik Morre Pedersen
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2005 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.357

3.  Three-dimensional morphological magnetic resonance imaging in infants and children with congenital heart disease.

Authors:  Michael Fenchel; Gerald F Greil; Petros Martirosian; Ulrich Kramer; Fritz Schick; Claus D Claussen; Ludger Sieverding; Stephan Miller
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2006-09-28

4.  Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of sinus venosus defects: comparison to surgical findings.

Authors:  Anne Marie Valente; Laureen Sena; Andrew J Powell; Pedro J Del Nido; Tal Geva
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2007-01-25       Impact factor: 1.655

Review 5.  Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance/European Society of Cardiovascular Imaging/American Society of Echocardiography/Society for Pediatric Radiology/North American Society for Cardiovascular Imaging Guidelines for the Use of Cardiac Magnetic Resonance in Pediatric Congenital and Acquired Heart Disease: Endorsed by The American Heart Association.

Authors:  Mark A Fogel; Shaftkat Anwar; Craig Broberg; Lorna Browne; Taylor Chung; Tiffanie Johnson; Vivek Muthurangu; Michael Taylor; Emanuela Valsangiacomo-Buechel; Carolyn Wilhelm
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2022-06-21       Impact factor: 8.589

Review 6.  Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance/European Society of Cardiovascular Imaging/American Society of Echocardiography/Society for Pediatric Radiology/North American Society for Cardiovascular Imaging Guidelines for the use of cardiovascular magnetic resonance in pediatric congenital and acquired heart disease : Endorsed by The American Heart Association.

Authors:  Mark A Fogel; Shaftkat Anwar; Craig Broberg; Lorna Browne; Taylor Chung; Tiffanie Johnson; Vivek Muthurangu; Michael Taylor; Emanuela Valsangiacomo-Buechel; Carolyn Wilhelm
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2022-06-21       Impact factor: 6.903

Review 7.  Atrial septal defect: spectrum of care.

Authors:  R Kharouf; D M Luxenberg; O Khalid; R Abdulla
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2007-10-23       Impact factor: 1.655

8.  Atypical atrial septal defects in children: noninvasive evaluation by cardiac MRI.

Authors:  Philipp Beerbaum; Victoria Parish; Aaron Bell; Jürgen Gieseke; Hermann Körperich; Samir Sarikouch
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2008-09-12

Review 9.  SCMR Position Paper (2020) on clinical indications for cardiovascular magnetic resonance.

Authors:  Tim Leiner; Jan Bogaert; Matthias G Friedrich; Raad Mohiaddin; Vivek Muthurangu; Saul Myerson; Andrew J Powell; Subha V Raman; Dudley J Pennell
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2020-11-09       Impact factor: 5.364

10.  Phase contrast cardiac magnetic resonance imaging versus transoesophageal echocardiography for the evaluation of feasibility for transcatheter closure of atrial septal defects.

Authors:  Tariq Rashid Shah; Jahangir Rashid Beig; Naseer Ahmad Choh; Fayaz Ahmad Rather; Irfan Yaqoob; Vicar Mohammad Jan
Journal:  Egypt Heart J       Date:  2022-04-13
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.