Literature DB >> 12801332

Outcome after intramedullary nailing of femoral shaft fractures.

Ian Harris1, Angela Hatfield, Geoff Donald, Judie Walton.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The results of intramedullary nailing of femoral shaft fractures from Australian institutions have not been widely reported. This study examines a consecutive group of patients treated at a major metropolitan trauma centre and reports on the injury statistics and outcome data, and compares this to previously reported results from the literature.
METHODS: A total of 101 fractures in 97 consecutive adult patients were included in the study. Nine patients were excluded. At a minimum of 6 months post injury, 54 patients were interviewed by telephone and 35 patients presented for clinical review and underwent physical examination, computed tomography (CT) scanogram of the lower limbs and Short Form 36 questionnaires.
RESULTS: Road trauma accounted for 81% of injuries and 15% of fractures were open. Of the 54 patients reviewed, 13 (23%) required further surgery for delayed or non-union. Of the 35 who presented for physical examination, there was poor correlation between perceived leg length discrepancy and measured leg length discrepancy on examination or scanogram. Presence of a limp correlated with measured leg length discrepancy of more than 1 cm but did not correlate with rotational abnormality measured on CT scanogram. Pain at the hip, thigh or knee was present in 60% of patients. The Short Form 36 scores for physical functioning, role--physical, bodily pain, general health and vitality were all significantly lower than population norms with P values ranging from <0.001-0.05. Subgroup analysis comparing isolated femur fracture to multi-trauma patients for all five of these parameters revealed significant differences only in the multi-trauma group.
CONCLUSION: The incidence of pain, limp, leg length discrepancy and delayed or non-union is higher in this study than in previously reported results of intramedullary nailing for femoral shaft fractures. This may be due to differences in the patient population, the skill level of the operating surgeon, or incomplete follow up.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12801332     DOI: 10.1046/j.1445-2197.2003.t01-1-02655.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ANZ J Surg        ISSN: 1445-1433            Impact factor:   1.872


  7 in total

1.  Femoral nailing-related coagulopathy determined by first-hit magnitude: an animal study.

Authors:  Peter V Giannoudis; Martijn van Griensven; Frank Hildebrand; Christian Krettek; Hans-Christoph Pape
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-01-10       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Femur fractures in professional athletes: a case series.

Authors:  Robby Sikka; Gary Fetzer; Thomas Hunkele; Eric Sugarman; Joel Boyd
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2015-02-13       Impact factor: 2.860

3.  Morphometric Study of the Atlas Vertebra using Manual Method.

Authors:  Shilpa N Gosavi; P Vatsalaswamy
Journal:  Malays Orthop J       Date:  2012-11

4.  Primary unreamed and unlocked intramedullary nailing of femoral shaft fractures.

Authors:  Ejb Sié; Ad Kacou; A Traoré; Bl Séry; Y Lambin
Journal:  Malays Orthop J       Date:  2012-11

5.  Influence of Hip Fracture on Knee Pain During Postoperative Rehabilitation.

Authors:  Hee-Ju Kim; Seong Jae Lee; Jung Keun Hyun; Seo-Young Kim; Tae Uk Kim
Journal:  Ann Rehabil Med       Date:  2018-10-31

6.  The effectiveness of the antegrade reamed technique: the experience and complications from 415 traumatic femoral shaft fractures.

Authors:  Efthimios J Karadimas; George Papadimitriou; Gerasimos Theodoratos; Anastasios Papanikolaou; John Maris
Journal:  Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr       Date:  2009-11-21

7.  The design of an "H" joystick for closed reduction and its application in segmental and comminuted femoral shaft fractures: an innovative technique.

Authors:  Zhaofeng Jia; Shijin Wang; Tinghui Xiao; Wei Jiang; Tianjian Zhou; Qisong Liu; Guangheng Li; Xinjia Hu
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2020-08-26       Impact factor: 2.359

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.