Literature DB >> 12801285

Scanning electron microscopic study of the cleaning ability of chlorhexidine as a root-canal irrigant.

J C Yamashita1, M Tanomaru Filho, M R Leonardo, M A Rossi, L A B Silva.   

Abstract

AIM: To evaluate in vitro the cleaning of root-canal walls after irrigation with different irrigants.
METHODOLOGY: A total of 36 recently extracted human teeth were divided into four experimental groups according to the irrigating solution used: saline; 2% chlorhexidine; 2.5% sodium hypochlorite; and 2.5% sodium hypochlorite + EDTA. The cleaning of the apical, middle and coronal thirds of the root canals was evaluated by scanning electron microscope examination using a 4-point scoring system.
RESULTS: The best cleaning was obtained using 2.5% sodium hypochlorite and EDTA, followed by 2.5% sodium hypochlorite only (P < 0.05), whose cleaning was similar to chlorhexidine only in the cervical third. Cleaning by saline and 2% chlorhexidine was worse than the other two groups and was similar in all thirds. Better cleaning was found in the cervical and middle thirds for all groups with the worst results in the apical third.
CONCLUSIONS: The apical third of the root canals was not cleaned as well as the middle and coronal thirds. Cleaning by chlorhexidine and saline was inferior compared to the cleaning by sodium hypochlorite with and without EDTA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12801285     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2591.2003.00656.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Endod J        ISSN: 0143-2885            Impact factor:   5.264


  6 in total

1.  Manual sonic-air and ultrasonic instrumentation of root canal and irrigation with 5.25% sodium hypochlorite and 17% Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid: A scanning electron microscope study.

Authors:  Ferit Koçani; Blerim Kamberi; Edmond Dragusha
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2012-04

2.  Removal efficiency of propolis paste dressing from the root canal.

Authors:  Fausto Rodrigo Victorino; Clovis Monteiro Bramante; Ronald Ordinola Zapata; Ana Regina Casaroto; Roberto Brandão Garcia; Ivaldo Gomes de Moraes; Mirian Marubayashi Hidalgo
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 2.698

3.  A Scanning Electron Microscope Evaluation of Smear Layer Removal and Antimicrobial Action of Mixture of Tetracycline, Acid and Detergent, Sodium Hypochlorite, Ethylenediaminetetraacetic Acid, and Chlorhexidine Gluconate: An In vitro Study.

Authors:  K M Charlie; M A Kuttappa; Liza George; K V Manoj; Bobby Joseph; Nishin K John
Journal:  J Int Soc Prev Community Dent       Date:  2018-02-22

4.  In vivo microbiological evaluation of the effect of biomechanical preparation of root canals using different irrigating solutions.

Authors:  Mário Tanomaru Filho; José Carlos Yamashita; Mario Roberto Leonardo; Léa Assed Bezerra da Silva; Juliane Maria Guerreiro Tanomaru; Izabel Yoko Ito
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 2.698

5.  Cleaning ability of chlorhexidine gel and sodium hypochlorite associated or not with EDTA as root canal irrigants: a scanning electron microscopy study.

Authors:  Bruno Carvalho de Vasconcelos; Suyane Maria Luna-Cruz; Gustavo De-Deus; Ivaldo Gomes de Moraes; Claudio Maniglia-Ferreira; Eduardo Diogo Gurgel-Filho
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 2.698

6.  Comparative analysis of endodontic smear layer removal efficacy of 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid, 7% maleic acid, and 2% chlorhexidine using scanning electron microscope: An in vitro study.

Authors:  Kailash Attur; Mathew T Joy; Riyas Karim; V J Anil Kumar; C Deepika; Haseena Ahmed
Journal:  J Int Soc Prev Community Dent       Date:  2016-08
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.