Literature DB >> 12800886

Son preference, sex selection, and the "new" new reproductive technologies.

Frank van Balen1, Marcia C Inhorn.   

Abstract

Throughout recorded history, humans have tried to influence the sex of their offspring, through pregnancy injunctions, infanticide, and infant/child neglect. Reproductive technologies developed in the late 20th century allow determination of the sex of the offspring during pregnancy, making "sex selection" through abortion possible. Especially in parts of East and South Asia, sex selection against female fetuses has had dramatic consequences for male/female sex ratios. However, "newer" new reproductive technologies, such as prenatal genetic diagnosis and DNA-weighted semen selection, can now be applied for sex selection; eventually, the latter technology may become easily accessible as a noninvasive method. The prospects of these new technologies for sex selection must be considered in the light of cultural values surrounding son preference / daughter discrimination in many parts of the world, most notably Asia, as well as preferences for a "gender-balanced" family in much of the West. The ethical issues surrounding these technologies, such as the right to life and the equal treatment of female children, are potentially profound, but legislating the appropriate use of these "newest" new reproductive technologies will be difficult.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Genetics and Reproduction

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12800886     DOI: 10.2190/PP5X-V039-3QGK-YQJB

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Health Serv        ISSN: 0020-7314            Impact factor:   1.663


  5 in total

1.  The Ethical Standards of Sunni Muslim Physicians Regarding Fertility Technologies that are Religiously Forbidden.

Authors:  Ya'arit Bokek-Cohen; Limor Dina Gonen; Mahdi Tarabeih
Journal:  J Relig Health       Date:  2022-05-26

2.  Where has the quest for conception taken us? Lessons from anthropology and sociology.

Authors:  Marcia C Inhorn
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Soc Online       Date:  2020-05-13

3.  The Israeli National Committee for sex selection by pre-implantation genetic diagnosis: a novel approach (2005-2011).

Authors:  Nirit Pessach; Saralee Glasser; Varda Soskolne; Amihai Barash; Liat Lerner-Geva
Journal:  Isr J Health Policy Res       Date:  2014-10-28

4.  Engendering Harm: A Critique of Sex Selection For "Family Balancing".

Authors:  Arianne Shahvisi
Journal:  J Bioeth Inq       Date:  2018-01-24       Impact factor: 1.352

5.  The effect of religious background on the attitude towards sex selection.

Authors:  Anastasia A Salame; Jospeh Nassif; Ghina S Ghazeeri; Elie M Moubarak; Antoine Hannoun; Antoine A Abu Musa
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol X       Date:  2019-05-17
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.