Literature DB >> 1280026

Free beta human choriogonadotropin in Down's syndrome screening: a multicentre study of its role compared with other biochemical markers.

K Spencer1, E J Coombes, A S Mallard, A M Ward.   

Abstract

To ascertain the value of maternal serum free beta-human choriogonadotropin subunit measurement in Down's syndrome screening and to compare its effectiveness when screening with a variety of biochemical markers, we have evaluated maternal serum free beta-human choriogonadotropin, total human choriogonadotropin, alpha-fetoprotein and unconjugated oestriol in a large multicentre study of over 2800 unaffected cases and 90 affected cases, the largest collection of Down's cases ever reported. Of all the markers identified to date, free beta-human choriogonadotropin is the marker of choice for use in Down's syndrome screening. When used in early gestation (14-16 weeks) in combination with alpha-fetoprotein and maternal age, it will allow the detection of 77% of Down's cases. A side-by-side comparison with the performance of total human choriogonadotropin shows the superior detection efficiency of free beta-human choriogonadotropin. Unconjugated oestriol adds nothing further to the detection rate compared with the use of alpha-fetoprotein and free beta-human choriogonadotropin alone, and its use results in a 1% increase in false positive rate. We conclude that unconjugated oestriol has no value in Down's screening. The superior detection rate obtained using free beta-human choriogonadotropin is a result of superior detection of Down's cases in women under 30 years old, where the free beta-human choriogonadotropin combination detects 100% more cases than does the total human choriogonadotropin combination.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1280026     DOI: 10.1177/000456329202900504

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Clin Biochem        ISSN: 0004-5632            Impact factor:   2.057


  18 in total

1.  Antenatal screening for Down's syndrome.

Authors:  H Cuckle; R Lilford
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1992-10-24

2.  Antenatal screening for Down's syndrome.

Authors:  K Spencer; J N Macri; E J Coombes; A M Ward
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1993-06-12

3.  Using decision analysis to compare policies for antenatal screening for Down's syndrome.

Authors:  J Fletcher; N R Hicks; J D Kay; P A Boyd
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1995-08-05

4.  Trade-offs in prenatal detection of Down syndrome.

Authors:  M Serra-Prat; P Gallo; A J Jovell; M Aymerich; M D Estrada
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Decision analysis and screening for Down's syndrome. Costs were overestimated.

Authors:  T M Reynolds
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1995-11-18

6.  Antenatal screening for Down's syndrome. Performance of different markers remains confused.

Authors:  J E Haddow; G J Knight; G E Palomaki
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1993-09-11

7.  Antenatal screening for Down's syndrome.

Authors:  N Wald; A Hackshaw
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1993-05-01

8.  Biochemical screening for Down's syndrome.

Authors:  M Connor
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1993-06-26

9.  Prenatal screening for trisomy 18 with free beta human chorionic gonadotrophin as a marker.

Authors:  K Spencer; A S Mallard; E J Coombes; J N Macri
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1993-12-04

10.  Prospective study of prenatal screening for Down's syndrome with free beta human chorionic gonadotrophin.

Authors:  K Spencer; P Carpenter
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1993-09-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.