Literature DB >> 12799405

Incremental treatment costs in national cancer institute-sponsored clinical trials.

Dana P Goldman1, Sandra H Berry, Mary S McCabe, Meredith L Kilgore, Arnold L Potosky, Michael L Schoenbaum, Matthias Schonlau, Jane C Weeks, Richard Kaplan, Jose J Escarce.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Concern about additional costs for direct patient care impedes efforts to enroll patients in clinical trials. But generalizable evidence substantiating these concerns is lacking.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the additional cost of treating cancer patients in the National Cancer Institute (NCI)-sponsored clinical trials in the United States across a range of trial phases, treatment modalities, and patient care settings.
DESIGN: Retrospective cost study using a multistage, stratified, random sample of patients enrolled in 1 of 35 active phase 3 trials or phase 1 or any phase 2 trials between October 1, 1998, and December 31, 1999. Unadjusted and adjusted costs were compared and related to trial phase, institution type, and vital status. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: A representative sample of 932 cancer patients enrolled in nonpediatric, NCI-sponsored clinical trials and 696 nonparticipants with a similar stage of disease not enrolled in a research protocol from 83 cancer clinical research institutions across the United States. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Direct treatment costs as measured using a combination of medical records, telephone survey, and Medicare claims data. Administrative and other research costs were excluded.
RESULTS: The incremental costs of direct care in trials were modest. Over approximately a 2.5-year period, adjusted costs were 6.5% higher for trial participants than nonparticipants (35,418 dollars vs 33,248 dollars; P =.11). Cost differences for phase 3 studies were 3.5% (P =.22), lower than for phase 1 or 2 trials (12.8%; P =.20). Trial participants who died had higher costs than nonparticipants who died (17.9%; 39,420 dollars vs 33,432 dollars, respectively; P =.15).
CONCLUSIONS: Treatment costs for nonpediatric clinical trial participants are on average 6.5% higher than what they would be if patients did not enroll. This implies total incremental treatment costs for NCI-sponsored trials of 16 million dollars in 1999. Incremental costs were higher for patients who died and who were in early phase studies although these findings deserve further scrutiny. Overall, the additional treatment costs of an open reimbursement policy for government-sponsored cancer clinical trials appear minimal.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12799405     DOI: 10.1001/jama.289.22.2970

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  26 in total

1.  Science in the Heartland: Exploring determinants of offering cancer clinical trials in rural-serving community urology practices.

Authors:  Shellie D Ellis; Mugur Geana; Christine B Mackay; Deborah J Moon; Jessie Gills; Andrew Zganjar; Gayle Brekke; J Brantley Thrasher; Tomas L Griebling
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2019-03-29       Impact factor: 3.498

2.  Policies to address disparities in clinical trials: the EDICT Project.

Authors:  Cynthia A Spiker; Armin D Weinberg
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.037

3.  Making the invisible visible: professional education to eliminate disparities in clinical trials.

Authors:  Larry Laufman
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.037

4.  Recognizing the Financial Burden of Cancer Patients in Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Ryan D Nipp; Elizabeth Powell; Bruce Chabner; Beverly Moy
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2015-05-18

5.  American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement on medicaid reform.

Authors:  Blase N Polite; Jennifer J Griggs; Beverly Moy; Christopher Lathan; Nefertiti C duPont; Gina Villani; Sandra L Wong; Michael T Halpern
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-11-17       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Possible health benefits from reducing occupational magnetic fields.

Authors:  Joseph D Bowman; Tapas K Ray; Robert M Park
Journal:  Am J Ind Med       Date:  2012-11-05       Impact factor: 2.214

7.  The Role of Clinical Trial Participation in Cancer Research: Barriers, Evidence, and Strategies.

Authors:  Joseph M Unger; Elise Cook; Eric Tai; Archie Bleyer
Journal:  Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book       Date:  2016

8.  Responsibility for costs associated with clinical trials.

Authors:  Paul J Martin; Nancy Davenport-Ennis; Nicholas J Petrelli; F Marc Stewart; Frederick R Appelbaum; Al Benson
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-09-15       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Insurance Clearance for Early-Phase Oncology Clinical Trials Following the Affordable Care Act.

Authors:  Kenneth L Kehl; Cheryl P Fullmer; Siqing Fu; Goldy C George; Kenneth R Hess; Filip Janku; Daniel D Karp; Shumei Kato; Cynthia K Kizer; Razelle Kurzrock; Aung Naing; Shubham Pant; Sarina A Piha-Paul; Vivek Subbiah; Apostolia M Tsimberidou; David S Hong
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2017-07-20       Impact factor: 12.531

10.  Financial Burden of Cancer Clinical Trial Participation and the Impact of a Cancer Care Equity Program.

Authors:  Ryan D Nipp; Hang Lee; Elizabeth Powell; Nicole E Birrer; Emily Poles; Daniel Finkelstein; Karen Winkfield; Sanja Percac-Lima; Bruce Chabner; Beverly Moy
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2016-03-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.