Literature DB >> 12798519

Extending the time limit for starting the Yuzpe regimen of emergency contraception to 120 hours.

Charlotte Ellertson1, Margaret Evans, Sue Ferden, Clare Leadbetter, Aileen Spears, Karen Johnstone, James Trussell.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Current protocols state that the Yuzpe regimen of emergency contraception can be initiated up to 72 hours after unprotected intercourse. The purpose of this study was to determine whether the window for emergency hormonal contraception can be extended to 120 hours.
METHODS: In an observational study, we tracked 111 women who requested emergency contraception between 72 and 120 hours after unprotected sex but refused postcoital copper intrauterine devices (IUDs), preferring instead the Yuzpe regimen. We compared failure rates for this group with rates among 675 otherwise similar women who started the same therapy within 72 hours.
RESULTS: Both perfect use (1.9%) and typical use (3.6%) failure rates were low among women presenting between 72 and 120 hours after unprotected intercourse. These rates did not statistically differ from failure rates for the standard Yuzpe regimen (2.0% during perfect use and 2.5% during typical use). Our small sample size of 111, however, gave us just 25% power to detect a doubling in the failure rates (2% to 4%) and 59% power to detect a tripling in the failure rates (2% to 6%).
CONCLUSION: The 72-hour cutoff for the Yuzpe regimen of emergency contraception appears needlessly restrictive. Women who request this therapy more than 72 hours after unprotected sex should be allowed to receive it, particularly if they decline postcoital insertion of a copper IUD and would otherwise have no options for reducing pregnancy risk.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12798519     DOI: 10.1016/s0029-7844(03)00352-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  17 in total

1.  Emergency contraception with a copper IUD or oral levonorgestrel: an observational study of 1-year pregnancy rates.

Authors:  David K Turok; Janet C Jacobson; Amna I Dermish; Sara E Simonsen; Shawn Gurtcheff; Molly McFadden; Patricia A Murphy
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2013-11-22       Impact factor: 3.375

2.  College students' perceptions of emergency contraception provision.

Authors:  Anjel Vahratian; Divya A Patel; Kristen Wolff; Xiao Xu
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2008 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.681

3.  Pharmacy students' knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors regarding emergency contraception.

Authors:  Denise Ragland; Donna West
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2009-04-07       Impact factor: 2.047

4.  Would you say you had unprotected sex if ...? Sexual health language in emails to a reproductive health website.

Authors:  L L Wynn; Angel M Foster; James Trussell
Journal:  Cult Health Sex       Date:  2010-06

Review 5.  Contraception in Canada: a review of method choices, characteristics, adherence and approaches to counselling.

Authors:  William A Fisher; Amanda Black
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2007-03-27       Impact factor: 8.262

6.  Emergency contraception in emergency departments in Oregon, 2003.

Authors:  Kenneth D Rosenberg; Jodi K Demunter; Jihong Liu
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2005-06-28       Impact factor: 9.308

7.  Disparities in the provision of sexually transmitted disease and pregnancy testing and prophylaxis for sexually assaulted women in Rhode Island emergency departments.

Authors:  Roland C Merchant; Benjamin Z Phillips; Allison K Delong; Kenneth H Mayer; Bruce M Becker
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 2.681

Review 8.  Hormonal contraception in adolescents: special considerations.

Authors:  Rollyn M Ornstein; Martin M Fisher
Journal:  Paediatr Drugs       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 3.022

9.  Emergency contraception: knowledge and attitudes of Nova Scotian family physicians.

Authors:  Donald B Langille; Michael Allen; Anne Marie Whelan
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 3.275

Review 10.  Interventions for emergency contraception.

Authors:  Jie Shen; Yan Che; Emily Showell; Ke Chen; Linan Cheng
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-08-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.