Jason Peart1, John P Headrick. 1. Heart Foundation Research Centre, School of Health Science, Griffith University Gold Coast Campus, Queensland 4217, Southport, Australia.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Signaling in adenosine-mediated preconditioning is controversial. We examined roles of mitochondrial (mito) K(ATP) channels, protein kinase C (PKC) and nitric oxide (NO). METHODS: Langendorff perfused C57/Bl6 mouse hearts were subjected to 20 min ischemia and 45 min reperfusion. Effects of adenosine-mediated preconditioning were assessed in the absence and presence of signaling inhibitors. RESULTS: Control hearts recovered 70+/-2 mmHg ventricular pressure, and released 18.1+/-2.0 IU/g lactate dehydrogenase (LDH). Preconditioning with 10 microM adenosine limited necrosis (10.6+/-1.4 IU/g) without modifying contractility (72+/-2 mmHg) whereas 50 microM adenosine reduced necrosis (10.3+/-1.6 IU/g) and contractile dysfunction (91+/-2 mmHg). All protective effects of 10 and 50 microM adenosine were abrogated by mito K(ATP) channel blockade with 100 microM 5-hydroxydecanoate (5-HD) during the 'trigger' phase, but unaltered by PKC or NO synthase inhibition with 3 microM chelerythrine or 100 microM N(G)-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME), respectively. Protection against necrosis was eliminated by 5-HD but unaltered by chelerythrine or L-NAME during the 'mediation' phase (ischemia-reperfusion). Reduced contractile dysfunction with 50 microM adenosine was partially sensitive to 5-HD and chelerythrine, and only eliminated by co-infusion of the inhibitors. CONCLUSIONS: Adenosine-mediated preconditioning is dose-dependent with high level stimulation reducing contractile dysfunction in addition to necrosis. Preconditioning is triggered by a mito K(ATP) channel dependent process independently of PKC and NO. Subsequent protection against necrosis is also mediated by a mito K(ATP) channel dependent process independent of PKC and NO. In contrast, functional protection may be mediated by parallel mito K(ATP) and PKC dependent paths.
OBJECTIVES: Signaling in adenosine-mediated preconditioning is controversial. We examined roles of mitochondrial (mito) K(ATP) channels, protein kinase C (PKC) and nitric oxide (NO). METHODS: Langendorff perfused C57/Bl6 mouse hearts were subjected to 20 min ischemia and 45 min reperfusion. Effects of adenosine-mediated preconditioning were assessed in the absence and presence of signaling inhibitors. RESULTS: Control hearts recovered 70+/-2 mmHg ventricular pressure, and released 18.1+/-2.0 IU/g lactate dehydrogenase (LDH). Preconditioning with 10 microM adenosine limited necrosis (10.6+/-1.4 IU/g) without modifying contractility (72+/-2 mmHg) whereas 50 microM adenosine reduced necrosis (10.3+/-1.6 IU/g) and contractile dysfunction (91+/-2 mmHg). All protective effects of 10 and 50 microM adenosine were abrogated by mito K(ATP) channel blockade with 100 microM 5-hydroxydecanoate (5-HD) during the 'trigger' phase, but unaltered by PKC or NO synthase inhibition with 3 microM chelerythrine or 100 microM N(G)-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME), respectively. Protection against necrosis was eliminated by 5-HD but unaltered by chelerythrine or L-NAME during the 'mediation' phase (ischemia-reperfusion). Reduced contractile dysfunction with 50 microM adenosine was partially sensitive to 5-HD and chelerythrine, and only eliminated by co-infusion of the inhibitors. CONCLUSIONS:Adenosine-mediated preconditioning is dose-dependent with high level stimulation reducing contractile dysfunction in addition to necrosis. Preconditioning is triggered by a mito K(ATP) channel dependent process independently of PKC and NO. Subsequent protection against necrosis is also mediated by a mito K(ATP) channel dependent process independent of PKC and NO. In contrast, functional protection may be mediated by parallel mito K(ATP) and PKC dependent paths.
Authors: Jason N Peart; Salvatore Pepe; Melissa E Reichelt; Nikkie Beckett; Louise See Hoe; Victoria Ozberk; Ingrid R Niesman; Hemal H Patel; John P Headrick Journal: Exp Gerontol Date: 2013-12-04 Impact factor: 4.032
Authors: Kirsten M Smeele; Otto Eerbeek; Anneke Koeman; Rick Bezemer; Can Ince; Sami Heikkinen; Markku Laakso; Arnold de Haan; Gert Schaart; Maarten R Drost; Markus W Hollmann; Coert J Zuurbier Journal: Pflugers Arch Date: 2010-02-25 Impact factor: 3.657
Authors: Melissa E Reichelt; Anu Shanu; Laura Willems; Paul K Witting; Natasha A Ellis; Michael R Blackburn; John P Headrick Journal: Antioxid Redox Signal Date: 2009-11 Impact factor: 8.401
Authors: Rianne Nederlof; Ebru Gürel-Gurevin; Otto Eerbeek; Chaoqin Xie; G Sjoerd Deijs; Moritz Konkel; Jun Hu; Nina C Weber; Cees A Schumacher; Antonius Baartscheer; Egbert G Mik; Markus W Hollmann; Fadi G Akar; Coert J Zuurbier Journal: J Physiol Biochem Date: 2017-03-03 Impact factor: 4.158
Authors: Coert J Zuurbier; Willeke M C Jong; Otto Eerbeek; Anneke Koeman; Wilco P Pulskens; Loes M Butter; Jaklien C Leemans; Markus W Hollmann Journal: PLoS One Date: 2012-07-27 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Rianne Nederlof; Mark A M van den Elshout; Anneke Koeman; Laween Uthman; Iris Koning; Otto Eerbeek; Nina C Weber; Markus W Hollmann; Coert J Zuurbier Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2017-10-06 Impact factor: 4.379