Literature DB >> 12798369

Contrasting changes of sensitivity by lymphocytes and neutrophils to mercury in developing grey seals.

A Lalancette1, Y Morin, L Measures, M Fournier.   

Abstract

Mercury is the principal metal contaminant in the St Lawrence Estuary. It impairs humoral, cellular and non-specific immune responses in many species. Since the immune system of juvenile seals is immature, it should react differently to the effects of contamination compared to that of mature animals. Phagocytosis and lymphoblastic transformation responses have been evaluated in the peripheral blood leukocytes of eight juvenile grey seals at different intervals of time over 11 weeks. Dose-response curves of 10(-9)-10(-3)M of methylmercury chloride have also been performed in vitro for evaluation of these two immune functions. The immune response of grey seals differs during their development. The phagocytosis response increased from the 2nd to 5th week post-weaning and then reached a plateau. As for the lymphoblastic transformation response, it was stable from the 2nd to the 3rd week post-weaning, increased significantly at week 4 post-weaning and then reached a plateau. These data suggest that these animals should be particularly vulnerable to infections, diseases and parasites before the 5th week post-weaning. Furthermore, mercury decreased the immune response, and age of seals had an effect on cell sensitivity to mercury. Concentrations of 10(-5)M of methylmercury chloride decreased phagocytosis and lymphoblastic transformation responses. Phagocytosis is more affected by MeHgCl contamination before this immune function reaches complete development which occurs at week 5 post-weaning. On the other hand, lymphoblastic transformation is more affected by this contaminant after its complete development which occurs at week 4 post-weaning.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12798369     DOI: 10.1016/s0145-305x(03)00038-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dev Comp Immunol        ISSN: 0145-305X            Impact factor:   3.636


  6 in total

1.  Mercury concentrations in hair from neonatal and juvenile Steller Sea Lions (Eumetopias jubatus): implications based on age and region in this northern Pacific marine sentinel piscivore.

Authors:  J Margaret Castellini; Lorrie D Rea; Camilla L Lieske; Kimberlee B Beckmen; Brian S Fadely; John M Maniscalco; Todd M O'Hara
Journal:  Ecohealth       Date:  2012-07-20       Impact factor: 3.184

2.  Disentangling interactions among mercury, immunity and infection in a Neotropical bat community.

Authors:  Daniel J Becker; Kelly A Speer; Jennifer M Korstian; Dmitriy V Volokhov; Hannah F Droke; Alexis M Brown; Catherene L Baijnauth; Ticha Padgett-Stewart; Hugh G Broders; Raina K Plowright; Thomas R Rainwater; M Brock Fenton; Nancy B Simmons; Matthew M Chumchal
Journal:  J Appl Ecol       Date:  2020-12-07       Impact factor: 6.528

3.  Genotoxic potency of mercuric chloride in gill cells of marine gastropod Planaxis sulcatus using comet assay.

Authors:  J Bhagat; B S Ingole
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-03-12       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  Predictors and immunological correlates of sublethal mercury exposure in vampire bats.

Authors:  Daniel J Becker; Matthew M Chumchal; Alexandra B Bentz; Steven G Platt; Gábor Á Czirják; Thomas R Rainwater; Sonia Altizer; Daniel G Streicker
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2017-04-19       Impact factor: 2.963

5.  Mercury immune toxicity in harbour seals: links to in vitro toxicity.

Authors:  Krishna Das; Ursula Siebert; Audrey Gillet; Aurélie Dupont; Carole Di-Poï; Sonja Fonfara; Gabriel Mazzucchelli; Edwin De Pauw; Marie-Claire De Pauw-Gillet
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2008-10-29       Impact factor: 5.984

6.  Meeting report: Methylmercury in marine ecosystems--from sources to seafood consumers.

Authors:  Celia Y Chen; Nancy Serrell; David C Evers; Bethany J Fleishman; Kathleen F Lambert; Jeri Weiss; Robert P Mason; Michael S Bank
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2008-07-23       Impact factor: 9.031

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.