Literature DB >> 12797563

Influence of the Sonicare toothbrush on the structure and thickness of laboratory grown Streptococcus mutans biofilms.

Joanna Heersink1, William J Costerton, Paul Stoodley.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of powered brushing with the Sonicare electronic toothbrush on the structure and thickness reduction of S. mutans biofilms using digital time-lapse microscopy (DTLM) and confocal microscopy (CM) techniques.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: S. mutans biofilms grown on glass microscope slides on BHI and 2% sucrose were exposed to Sonicare for 15 seconds with the bristle tips just contacting the slide, and at distances of 0.5, 1.0, and 1.5 mm above the slide.
RESULTS: With direct bristle contact, the reduction in biofilm thickness was greater than 99%. DTLM showed the break up and detachment of biofilm caused by the shear forces generated by the rapid bristle motion in real time. The Sonicare was shown to significantly reduce biofilm thickness even when the bristles were 1 mm above the biofilm. The percent biofilm thickness reduction was inversely proportional to the bristle distance. This study demonstrates the Sonicare toothbrush effectively removed biofilm from hard flat surfaces both by direct bristle contact and by fluid dynamic shear forces alone.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12797563

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Dent        ISSN: 0894-8275            Impact factor:   1.522


  6 in total

1.  Removal of interproximal dental biofilms by high-velocity water microdrops.

Authors:  A Rmaile; D Carugo; L Capretto; M Aspiras; M De Jager; M Ward; P Stoodley
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2013-10-29       Impact factor: 6.116

Review 2.  Brushing without brushing?--a review of the efficacy of powered toothbrushes in noncontact biofilm removal.

Authors:  Julia C Schmidt; Christian Zaugg; Roland Weiger; Clemens Walter
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2012-09-23       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Antimicrobial penetration in a dual-species oral biofilm after noncontact brushing: an in vitro study.

Authors:  Y He; B W Peterson; Y Ren; H C van der Mei; H J Busscher
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2013-09-10       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  Comparative Study of Different Sampling Methods of Biofilm Formed on Stainless-Steel Surfaces in a CDC Biofilm Reactor.

Authors:  Nissa Niboucha; Coralie Goetz; Laurie Sanschagrin; Juliette Fontenille; Ismaïl Fliss; Steve Labrie; Julie Jean
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-06-13       Impact factor: 6.064

5.  Ultrasonic-enhanced gentamicin transport through colony biofilms of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Escherichia coli.

Authors:  John C Carmen; Jared L Nelson; Benjamin L Beckstead; Christopher M Runyan; Rachel A Robison; G Bruce Schaalje; William G Pitt
Journal:  J Infect Chemother       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 2.211

6.  Interproximal biofilm removal by intervallic use of a sonic toothbrush compared to an oral irrigation system.

Authors:  Pune N Tawakoli; Bärbel Sauer; Klaus Becker; Wolfgang Buchalla; Thomas Attin
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2015-08-05       Impact factor: 2.757

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.