OBJECTIVE: To restore islet function in patients whose labile diabetes subjected them to frequent dangerous episodes of hypoglycemic unawareness, and to determine whether multiple transplants are always required to achieve insulin independence. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: The recent report by the Edmonton group documenting restoration of insulin independence by islet transplantation in seven consecutive patients with type 1 diabetes differed from previous worldwide experience of only sporadic success. In the Edmonton patients, the transplanted islet mass critical for success was approximately more than 9,000 IEq/kg of recipient body weight and required two or three separate transplants of islets isolated from two to four cadaveric donors. Whether the success of the Edmonton group can be recapitulated by others, and whether repeated transplants using multiple donors will be a universal requirement for success have not been reported. METHODS: The authors report their treatment with islet transplantation of nine patients whose labile type 1 diabetes was characterized by frequent episodes of dangerous hypoglycemia. RESULTS: In each of the seven patients who have completed the treatment protocol (i.e., one or if necessary a second islet transplant), insulin independence has been achieved. In five of the seven patients only a single infusion of islets was required. To date, only one recipient has subsequently lost graft function, after an initially successful transplant. This patient suffered recurrent hyperglycemia 9 months after the transplant. CONCLUSIONS: This report confirms the efficacy of the Edmonton immunosuppressive regimen and indicates that insulin independence can often be achieved by a single transplant of sufficient islet mass.
OBJECTIVE: To restore islet function in patients whose labile diabetes subjected them to frequent dangerous episodes of hypoglycemic unawareness, and to determine whether multiple transplants are always required to achieve insulin independence. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: The recent report by the Edmonton group documenting restoration of insulin independence by islet transplantation in seven consecutive patients with type 1 diabetes differed from previous worldwide experience of only sporadic success. In the Edmonton patients, the transplanted islet mass critical for success was approximately more than 9,000 IEq/kg of recipient body weight and required two or three separate transplants of islets isolated from two to four cadaveric donors. Whether the success of the Edmonton group can be recapitulated by others, and whether repeated transplants using multiple donors will be a universal requirement for success have not been reported. METHODS: The authors report their treatment with islet transplantation of nine patients whose labile type 1 diabetes was characterized by frequent episodes of dangerous hypoglycemia. RESULTS: In each of the seven patients who have completed the treatment protocol (i.e., one or if necessary a second islet transplant), insulin independence has been achieved. In five of the seven patients only a single infusion of islets was required. To date, only one recipient has subsequently lost graft function, after an initially successful transplant. This patient suffered recurrent hyperglycemia 9 months after the transplant. CONCLUSIONS: This report confirms the efficacy of the Edmonton immunosuppressive regimen and indicates that insulin independence can often be achieved by a single transplant of sufficient islet mass.
Authors: J L Contreras; G Bilbao; C Smyth; D E Eckhoff; X L Xiang; S Jenkins; S Cartner; D T Curiel; F T Thomas; J M Thomas Journal: Surgery Date: 2001-08 Impact factor: 3.982
Authors: John J Casey; Jonathan R Lakey; Edmond A Ryan; Breay W Paty; Richard Owen; Kevin O'Kelly; Sulaiman Nanji; Ray V Rajotte; Gregory S Korbutt; David Bigam; Norman N Kneteman; A M Shapiro Journal: Transplantation Date: 2002-10-15 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: A Pileggi; R D Molano; T Berney; P Cattan; C Vizzardelli; R Oliver; C Fraker; C Ricordi; R L Pastori; F H Bach; L Inverardi Journal: Diabetes Date: 2001-09 Impact factor: 9.461
Authors: E A Ryan; J R Lakey; R V Rajotte; G S Korbutt; T Kin; S Imes; A Rabinovitch; J F Elliott; D Bigam; N M Kneteman; G L Warnock; I Larsen; A M Shapiro Journal: Diabetes Date: 2001-04 Impact factor: 9.461
Authors: Dixon B Kaufman; Marshall S Baker; Xiaojuan Chen; Joseph R Leventhal; Frank P Stuart Journal: Am J Transplant Date: 2002-08 Impact factor: 8.086
Authors: Edmond A Ryan; Jonathan R T Lakey; Breay W Paty; Sharleen Imes; Gregory S Korbutt; Norman M Kneteman; David Bigam; Ray V Rajotte; A M James Shapiro Journal: Diabetes Date: 2002-07 Impact factor: 9.461
Authors: Morihito Takita; Shinichi Matsumoto; Hirofumi Noguchi; Masayuki Shimoda; Daisuke Chujo; Koji Sugimoto; Takeshi Itoh; Jeffrey P Lamont; Luis F Lara; Nicholas Onaca; Bashoo Naziruddin; Goran B Klintmalm; Marlon F Levy Journal: Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent) Date: 2010-10
Authors: Adam Frank; Shaoping Deng; Xiaolun Huang; Ergun Velidedeoglu; Yong-Suk Bae; Chengyang Liu; Peter Abt; Robert Stephenson; Muhammad Mohiuddin; Thav Thambipillai; Eileen Markmann; Maral Palanjian; Marty Sellers; Ali Naji; Clyde F Barker; James F Markmann Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2004-10 Impact factor: 12.969