Literature DB >> 12796461

Effects of the local mechanical environment on vertebrate tissue differentiation during repair: does repair recapitulate development?

Dennis M Cullinane1, Kristy T Salisbury, Yaser Alkhiary, Solomon Eisenberg, Louis Gerstenfeld, Thomas A Einhorn.   

Abstract

The local mechanical environment is a crucial factor in determining cell and tissue differentiation during vertebrate skeletal development and repair. Unlike the basic response of bone to mechanical load, as described in Wolff's law, the mechanobiological relationship between the local mechanical environment and tissue differentiation influences everything from tissue type and molecular architecture to the formation of complex joints. This study tests the hypothesis that precisely controlled mechanical loading can regulate gene expression, tissue differentiation and tissue architecture in the adult skeleton and that precise manipulation of the defect's local mechanical environment can initiate a limited recapitulation of joint tissue development. We generated tissue type predictions using finite element models (FEMs) interpreted by published mechanobiological fate maps of tissue differentiation. The experiment included a custom-designed external fixator capable of introducing daily bending, shear or a combination of bending and shear load regimens to induce precisely controlled mechanical conditions within healing femoral defects. Tissue types and ratios were characterized using histomorphometrics and molecular markers. Tissue molecular architecture was quantified using polarized light and Fourier transforms, while immunological staining and in situ hybridization were used to characterize gene expression. The finite element models predicted the differentiation of cartilage within the defects and that substantial fibrous tissues would develop along the extreme excursion peripheries in the bending group. The three experimentally induced loading regimens produced contiguous cartilage bands across all experimental defects, inhibiting bony healing. Histomorphometric analysis of the ratios of cartilage to bone in the experimental groups were not significantly different from those for the knee joint, and Fourier transform analysis determined significantly different collagen fibril angle specializations within superficial, intermediate and deep layers of all experimental cartilages (P<0.0001), approximating those for articular cartilage. All stimulations resulted in the expression of collagen type II, while the bending stimulation also resulted in the expression of the joint-determining gene GDF-5. These findings indicate that the local mechanical environment is an important regulator of gene expression, tissue differentiation and tissue architecture.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12796461     DOI: 10.1242/jeb.00453

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  14 in total

1.  Temporal evolution of skeletal regenerated tissue: what can mechanical investigation add to biological?

Authors:  Remy Casanova; Didier Moukoko; Martine Pithioux; Cyril Pailler-Mattéi; Hassan Zahouani; Patrick Chabrand
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2010-06-02       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  An immunohistochemical study of the tissue bridging adult spondylolytic defects--the presence and significance of fibrocartilaginous entheses.

Authors:  Bronek M Boszczyk; Alexandra A Boszczyk; Wolfdietrich Boos; Andreas Korge; H Michael Mayer; Reinhard Putz; Michael Benjamin; Stefan Milz
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-09-07       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Finite element modeling of 3D human mesenchymal stem cell-seeded collagen matrices exposed to tensile strain.

Authors:  T Wayne Pfeiler; Ruwan D Sumanasinghe; Elizabeth G Loboa
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2008-06-09       Impact factor: 2.712

4.  Correlations between local strains and tissue phenotypes in an experimental model of skeletal healing.

Authors:  Elise F Morgan; Kristy T Salisbury Palomares; Ryan E Gleason; Daniel L Bellin; Karen B Chien; Ginu U Unnikrishnan; Pui L Leong
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2010-05-23       Impact factor: 2.712

5.  A COMPUTATIONAL ANALYSIS OF BONE FORMATION IN THE CRANIAL VAULT USING A COUPLED REACTION-DIFFUSION-STRAIN MODEL.

Authors:  Chanyoung Lee; Joan T Richtsmeier; Reuben H Kraft
Journal:  J Mech Med Biol       Date:  2017-05-29       Impact factor: 0.897

6.  Transcriptional profiling and biochemical analysis of mechanically induced cartilaginous tissues in a rat model.

Authors:  Kristy T Salisbury Palomares; Louis C Gerstenfeld; Nathan A Wigner; Marc E Lenburg; Thomas A Einhorn; Elise F Morgan
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2010-04

7.  Temporal evolution of mechanical properties of skeletal tissue regeneration in rabbits: an experimental study.

Authors:  Didier Moukoko; Martine Pithioux; Patrick Chabrand
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2007-08-11       Impact factor: 2.602

8.  Assessment of a mechano-regulation theory of skeletal tissue differentiation in an in vivo model of mechanically induced cartilage formation.

Authors:  Lauren Nicole Miller Hayward; Elise F Morgan
Journal:  Biomech Model Mechanobiol       Date:  2009-01-21

9.  Mechanical stimulation alters tissue differentiation and molecular expression during bone healing.

Authors:  Kristy T Salisbury Palomares; Ryan E Gleason; Zachary D Mason; Dennis M Cullinane; Thomas A Einhorn; Louis C Gerstenfeld; Elise F Morgan
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 3.494

10.  Loss of BMP signaling mediated by BMPR1A in osteoblasts leads to differential bone phenotypes in mice depending on anatomical location of the bones.

Authors:  Honghao Zhang; Yanshuai Zhang; Masahiko Terajima; Genevieve Romanowicz; Yangjia Liu; Maiko Omi; Erin Bigelow; Danese M Joiner; Erik I Waldorff; Peizhi Zhu; Mekhala Raghavan; Michelle Lynch; Nobuhiro Kamiya; Rongqing Zhang; Karl J Jepsen; Steve Goldstein; Michael D Morris; Mitsuo Yamauchi; David H Kohn; Yuji Mishina
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 4.398

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.