Literature DB >> 12796197

Detection of lung cancer with volatile markers in the breath.

Michael Phillips1, Renee N Cataneo, Andrew R C Cummin, Anthony J Gagliardi, Kevin Gleeson, Joel Greenberg, Roger A Maxfield, William N Rom.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in the breath as tumor markers in lung cancer. Alkanes and monomethylated alkanes are oxidative stress products that are excreted in the breath, the catabolism of which may be accelerated by polymorphic cytochrome p450-mixed oxidase enzymes that are induced in patients with lung cancer.
DESIGN: Combined case-control and cross-sectional study.
SETTING: Five academic pulmonary medicine services in the United States and the United Kingdom. PATIENTS AND PARTICIPANTS: One hundred seventy-eight bronchoscopy patients and 41 healthy volunteers. INTERVENTION: Breath samples were analyzed by gas chromatography and mass spectroscopy to determine alveolar gradients (ie, the abundance in breath minus the abundance in room air) of C4-C20 alkanes and monomethylated alkanes. MEASUREMENTS: Patients with primary lung cancer (PLC) were compared to healthy volunteers, and a predictive model was constructed using forward stepwise discriminant analysis of the alveolar gradients. This model was cross-validated with a leave-one-out jackknife technique and was tested in two additional groups of patients who had not been used to develop the model (ie, bronchoscopy patients in whom cancer was not detected, and patients with metastatic lung cancer [MLC]).
RESULTS: Eighty-seven of 178 patients had lung cancer (PLC, 67 patients; MLC, 15 patients; undetermined, 5 patients). A predictive model employing nine VOCs identified PLC with a sensitivity of 89.6% (60 of 67 patients) and a specificity of 82.9% (34 of 41 patients). On cross-validation, the sensitivity was 85.1% (57 of 67 patients) and the specificity was 80.5% (33 of 41 patients). The stratification of patients by tobacco smoking status, histologic type of cancer, and TNM stage of cancer revealed no marked effects. In the two additional tests, the model predicted MLC with a sensitivity of 66.7% (10 of 15 patients), and it classified the cancer-negative bronchoscopy patients with a specificity of 37.4% (34 of 91 patients).
CONCLUSIONS: Compared to healthy volunteers, patients with PLC had abnormal breath test findings that were consistent with the accelerated catabolism of alkanes and monomethylated alkanes. A predictive model employing nine of these VOCs exhibited sufficient sensitivity and specificity to be considered as a screen for lung cancer in a high-risk population such as adult smokers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12796197     DOI: 10.1378/chest.123.6.2115

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chest        ISSN: 0012-3692            Impact factor:   9.410


  101 in total

Review 1.  Advances in electronic-nose technologies developed for biomedical applications.

Authors:  Alphus D Wilson; Manuela Baietto
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2011-01-19       Impact factor: 3.576

Review 2.  After Detection: The Improved Accuracy of Lung Cancer Assessment Using Radiologic Computer-aided Diagnosis.

Authors:  Guy J Amir; Harold P Lehmann
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2015-11-23       Impact factor: 3.173

3.  Impact of airway gas exchange on the multiple inert gas elimination technique: theory.

Authors:  Joseph C Anderson; Michael P Hlastala
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 3.934

4.  Detection of lung cancer by sensor array analyses of exhaled breath.

Authors:  Roberto F Machado; Daniel Laskowski; Olivia Deffenderfer; Timothy Burch; Shuo Zheng; Peter J Mazzone; Tarek Mekhail; Constance Jennings; James K Stoller; Jacqueline Pyle; Jennifer Duncan; Raed A Dweik; Serpil C Erzurum
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2005-03-04       Impact factor: 21.405

5.  Exhaled breath analysis: from occupational to respiratory medicine.

Authors:  Massimo Corradi; Antonio Mutti
Journal:  Acta Biomed       Date:  2005

6.  Diagnosis of lung cancer by the analysis of exhaled breath with a colorimetric sensor array.

Authors:  Peter J Mazzone; Jeffrey Hammel; Raed Dweik; Jie Na; Carmen Czich; Daniel Laskowski; Tarek Mekhail
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2007-02-27       Impact factor: 9.139

Review 7.  Lung cancer screening.

Authors:  Peter J Mazzone; Tarek Mekhail
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 5.075

8.  Noninvasive detection of lung cancer by analysis of exhaled breath.

Authors:  Amel Bajtarevic; Clemens Ager; Martin Pienz; Martin Klieber; Konrad Schwarz; Magdalena Ligor; Tomasz Ligor; Wojciech Filipiak; Hubert Denz; Michael Fiegl; Wolfgang Hilbe; Wolfgang Weiss; Peter Lukas; Herbert Jamnig; Martin Hackl; Alfred Haidenberger; Bogusław Buszewski; Wolfram Miekisch; Jochen Schubert; Anton Amann
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2009-09-29       Impact factor: 4.430

9.  Clinical applications of breath testing.

Authors:  Kelly M Paschke; Alquam Mashir; Raed A Dweik
Journal:  F1000 Med Rep       Date:  2010-07-22

10.  Release of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from the lung cancer cell line CALU-1 in vitro.

Authors:  Wojciech Filipiak; Andreas Sponring; Tomas Mikoviny; Clemens Ager; Jochen Schubert; Wolfram Miekisch; Anton Amann; Jakob Troppmair
Journal:  Cancer Cell Int       Date:  2008-11-24       Impact factor: 5.722

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.