Literature DB >> 1279574

Diastolic mitral regurgitation in patients with first-degree atrioventricular block.

T Ishikawa1, K Kimura, N Miyazaki, O Tochikubo, T Usui, M Kashiwagi, M Ishii.   

Abstract

Diastolic mitral regurgitation has been observed in patients with DDD pacemakers when the atrioventricular (AV) delay was prolonged. However, diastolic mitral regurgitation associated with first-degree AV block has not been fully studied. We examined transmitral blood flow in 24 patients with first-degree AV block and normal cardiac function (ages 35.3 +/- 17.4 years), and in nine patients with DDD pacemakers and normal cardiac function (ages 73.1 +/- 8.1 years), using pulsed Doppler echocardiography. Diastolic mitral regurgitation was observed in 19 of 24 patients with first-degree AV block. Although PQ interval was shortened from 0.32 +/- 0.06 to 0.20 +/- 0.05 seconds (P < 0.01) after 1 mg atropine sulfate IV, the interval between P wave (ECG) and the beginning of diastolic mitral regurgitation did not change, while the duration of diastolic mitral regurgitation was shortened from 0.15 +/- 0.03 to 0.05 +/- 0.03 seconds (P < 0.01). There was a significant correlation between changes in PQ interval and changes in the duration of diastolic mitral regurgitation (r = 0.92, P < 0.001). Although cardiac output (3.9 +/- 0.05 L/min) and pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (5.1 +/- 1.5 mmHg) were normal in all patients with pacemakers, diastolic mitral regurgitation was observed when the AV delay was prolonged. The critical PQ interval for the appearance of diastolic mitral regurgitation was 0.23 +/- 0.01 seconds. In patients with prolonged PQ intervals, delayed ventricular contraction following atrial contraction may be associated with mitral regurgitation in the presence of a reversed AV pressure gradient.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1279574     DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1992.tb02996.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol        ISSN: 0147-8389            Impact factor:   1.976


  10 in total

1.  Minimizing right ventricular pacing in pacemaker patients with intact and compromised atrioventricular conduction : Results from the EVITA Trial.

Authors:  A Bauer; J Vermeulen; L Toivonen; J Voitk; C Barr; P Peytchev
Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol       Date:  2015-08-28

Review 2.  The importance of avoiding unnecessary right ventricular pacing in clinical practice.

Authors:  Finn Akerström; Miguel A Arias; Marta Pachón; Jesús Jiménez-López; Alberto Puchol; Justo Juliá-Calvo
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2013-11-26

Review 3.  Cardiac pacing in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  F M Kusumoto; N Goldschlager
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 1.900

4.  Association Between a Prolonged PR Interval and Outcomes of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: A Report From the National Cardiovascular Data Registry.

Authors:  Daniel J Friedman; Haikun Bao; Erica S Spatz; Jeptha P Curtis; James P Daubert; Sana M Al-Khatib
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2016-10-19       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 5.  Impact of common rhythm disturbances on echocardiographic measurements and interpretation.

Authors:  Daniel A Gomes; Rita Reis Santos; Pedro Freitas; Mariana Sousa Paiva; João Abecasis; Maria Salomé Carvalho; Frank A Flachskampf; Maria João Andrade
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2022-09-10       Impact factor: 6.138

6.  Non-physiological increase of AV conduction time in sinus disease patients programmed in AAIR-based pacing mode.

Authors:  Philippe Mabo; Jean-Pierre Cebron; Aude Solnon; Aude Tassin; Laurence Graindorge; Daniel Gras
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2012-07-27       Impact factor: 1.900

7.  Long-term outcomes in individuals with prolonged PR interval or first-degree atrioventricular block.

Authors:  Susan Cheng; Michelle J Keyes; Martin G Larson; Elizabeth L McCabe; Christopher Newton-Cheh; Daniel Levy; Emelia J Benjamin; Ramachandran S Vasan; Thomas J Wang
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2009-06-24       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Atrioventricular block can be used as a risk predictor of clinical atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Xiao Zhao; Chaofeng Sun; Miaomiao Cao; Hao Li
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2019-03-18       Impact factor: 2.882

Review 9.  Predictors of persistence of functional mitral regurgitation after cardiac resynchronization therapy: Review of literature.

Authors:  Eleonora Russo; Giulio Russo; Maurizio Braccio; Mauro Cassese
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2022-03-26

10.  Cardiac conduction system abnormalities in ankylosing spondylitis: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Helena Forsblad-d'Elia; Hanna Wallberg; Eva Klingberg; Hans Carlsten; Lennart Bergfeldt
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2013-08-12       Impact factor: 2.362

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.