Literature DB >> 12793494

Evaluation of the Sports Ankle Rating System in young, athletic individuals with acute lateral ankle sprains.

Glenn N Williams1, Joseph M Molloy, Thomas M DeBerardino, Robert A Arciero, Dean C Taylor.   

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to introduce the Sports Ankle Rating System and provide the initial validation for its use. As its name implies, this outcomes measurement system is intended for use in assessing the functional outcomes of athletes with ankle injuries. This unique system consists of three distinct instruments: the Quality of Life Measure, the Clinical Rating Score, and the Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation. We began the validation process of the Sports Ankle Rating System with subjects who had sustained lateral ankle sprains because this is the most common injury in sports. The results of this study indicate that the Sports Ankle Rating System is: 1. effective at assessing the impact that an ankle sprain has on an athlete's functional and psychosocial status, 2. responsive to changes in an athlete's ankle-related health status, and 3. valid and reliable as tested.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12793494     DOI: 10.1177/107110070302400314

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Foot Ankle Int        ISSN: 1071-1007            Impact factor:   2.827


  11 in total

1.  Validity and reliability of a Dutch version of the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure.

Authors:  Hanneke Weel; Ruben Zwiers; Donija Azim; Inger N Sierevelt; Daniel Haverkamp; C Niek van Dijk; Gino M M J Kerkhoffs
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-12-25       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Development and reliability of the ankle instability instrument.

Authors:  Carrie L Docherty; Bruce M Gansneder; Brent L Arnold; Shepard R Hurwitz
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2006 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.860

Review 3.  National Athletic Trainers' Association position statement: conservative management and prevention of ankle sprains in athletes.

Authors:  Thomas W Kaminski; Jay Hertel; Ned Amendola; Carrie L Docherty; Michael G Dolan; J Ty Hopkins; Eric Nussbaum; Wendy Poppy; Doug Richie
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2013 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.860

4.  Reliability and validity of the foot and ankle outcome score: a validation study from Iran.

Authors:  Hossein Negahban; Masood Mazaheri; Mahyar Salavati; Soheil Mansour Sohani; Marjan Askari; Hossein Fanian; Mohamad Parnianpour
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2010-02-07       Impact factor: 2.980

5.  Long term outcomes of inversion ankle injuries.

Authors:  A Anandacoomarasamy; L Barnsley
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 13.800

6.  Criteria-Based Return to Sport Decision-Making Following Lateral Ankle Sprain Injury: a Systematic Review and Narrative Synthesis.

Authors:  Bruno Tassignon; Jo Verschueren; Eamonn Delahunt; Michelle Smith; Bill Vicenzino; Evert Verhagen; Romain Meeusen
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 11.136

7.  Validity and reliability of a self-administered foot evaluation questionnaire (SAFE-Q).

Authors:  Hisateru Niki; Shinobu Tatsunami; Naoki Haraguchi; Takafumi Aoki; Ryuzo Okuda; Yasunori Suda; Masato Takao; Yasuhito Tanaka
Journal:  J Orthop Sci       Date:  2013-01-09       Impact factor: 1.601

8.  Validity and reliability of the Foot Function Index (FFI) questionnaire Brazilian-Portuguese version.

Authors:  Bruna Reclusa Martinez; Isabela Maschk Staboli; Danilo Harudy Kamonseki; Elly Budiman-Mak; Liu Chiao Yi
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2016-10-18

Review 9.  Acute ankle sprain in athletes: Clinical aspects and algorithmic approach.

Authors:  Farzin Halabchi; Mohammad Hassabi
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2020-12-18

Review 10.  Managing ankle ligament sprains and tears: current opinion.

Authors:  Ryan P McGovern; RobRoy L Martin
Journal:  Open Access J Sports Med       Date:  2016-03-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.