Literature DB >> 12792507

Factors associated with ambivalence about bone marrow donation among newly recruited unrelated potential donors.

Galen E Switzer1, Larissa Myaskovsky, Jean M Goycoolea, Mary Amanda Dew, Dennis L Confer, Roberta King.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Previous research has indicated that feelings of ambivalence about donation are associated with donors' decisions not to donate and with less positive physical and psychosocial outcomes among donors who donated despite feeling ambivalent. The current study examines the prevalence of ambivalence among newly recruited potential bone marrow donors and identifies factors associated with greater ambivalence.
METHODS: Using a cross-sectional design, questionnaires were mailed to a stratified random sample of individuals newly recruited to the National Marrow Donor Program registry at 71 local donor centers. A total of 426 new recruits (63%) completed and returned the questionnaire.
RESULTS: Bivariate analyses indicated that multiple recruitment experience and donor perception variables were significantly associated with ambivalence. Multivariate analysis revealed that the following eight variables were uniquely associated with higher levels of ambivalence after adjusting for the effects of other key indicators: participating in other volunteer activities, joining at a drive for a specific patient, perceiving the recruitment staff as less informative, being discouraged from joining by others, not having an intrinsic commitment to donate, being encouraged by one's culture or religion to join, believing there are risks to donation, and having a greater number of medical, work, and family concerns about donation.
CONCLUSIONS: Potential donors who are motivated by an intrinsic commitment to donate, rather than extrinsic pressure, are less ambivalent about donating. In addition, recruitment staff have a potentially critical role in reducing ambivalence among new recruits by providing information that may allay any unrealistic concerns recruits may have about the medical risks and impact of donation on work and family.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12792507     DOI: 10.1097/01.TP.0000060251.40758.98

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transplantation        ISSN: 0041-1337            Impact factor:   4.939


  20 in total

1.  Healthcare professionals' perceptions of the barriers to living donor kidney transplantation among African Americans.

Authors:  Lilless M Shilling; Michele L Norman; Kenneth D Chavin; Laura G Hildebrand; Shayna L Lunsford; Margaret S Martin; Jennifer E Milton; Gilbert R Smalls; Prabhakar K Baliga
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 1.798

Review 2.  A review of the haematopoietic stem cell donation experience: is there room for improvement?

Authors:  A Billen; J A Madrigal; B E Shaw
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2014-01-27       Impact factor: 5.483

3.  Giving blood and enrolling on the stem cell donor registry: ranking of obstacles and motives in Switzerland.

Authors:  Thomas Bart; Thomas Volken; Yvonne Fischer; Behrouz Mansouri Taleghani
Journal:  Transfus Med Hemother       Date:  2014-07-04       Impact factor: 3.747

4.  Ethnicity, length of time on the register and sex predict donor availability at the confirmatory typing stage.

Authors:  R N Lown; S G E Marsh; G E Switzer; K A Latham; J A Madrigal; B E Shaw
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2014-01-13       Impact factor: 5.483

5.  Health-Related Quality-of-Life Comparison of Adult Related and Unrelated HSC Donors: An RDSafe Study.

Authors:  Galen E Switzer; Jessica G Bruce; Deidre M Kiefer; Hati Kobusingye; Kaleab Z Abebe; Rebecca Drexler; RaeAnne M Besser; Dennis L Confer; Mary M Horowitz; Roberta J King; Bronwen E Shaw; Marcie Riches; Brandon Hayes-Lattin; Michael Linenberger; Brian Bolwell; Scott D Rowley; Mark R Litzow; Michael A Pulsipher
Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant       Date:  2020-08-21       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  The impact of iMedConsent on patient decision-making regarding cholecystectomy and inguinal herniorrhaphy.

Authors:  Daniel E Hall; Barbara H Hanusa; Galen E Switzer; Michael J Fine; Robert M Arnold
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2011-05-23       Impact factor: 2.192

7.  Social and Financial Outcomes of Living Liver Donation: A Prospective Investigation Within the Adult-to-Adult Living Donor Liver Transplantation Cohort Study 2 (A2ALL-2).

Authors:  A DiMartini; M A Dew; Q Liu; M A Simpson; D P Ladner; A R Smith; J Zee; S Abbey; B W Gillespie; R Weinrieb; M S Mandell; R A Fisher; J C Emond; C E Freise; A H Sherker; Z Butt
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2016-11-10       Impact factor: 8.086

8.  Health-Related Quality of Life among Older Related Hematopoietic Stem Cell Donors (>60 Years) Is Equivalent to That of Younger Related Donors (18 to 60 Years): A Related Donor Safety Study.

Authors:  Galen E Switzer; Jessica Bruce; Deidre M Kiefer; Hati Kobusingye; Rebecca Drexler; RaeAnne M Besser; Dennis L Confer; Mary M Horowitz; Roberta J King; Bronwen E Shaw; Marcie Riches; Brandon Hayes-Lattin; Michael Linenberger; Brian Bolwell; Scott D Rowley; Mark R Litzow; Michael A Pulsipher
Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant       Date:  2016-10-14       Impact factor: 5.742

9.  Health-Related Quality of Life among Pediatric Hematopoietic Stem Cell Donors.

Authors:  Galen E Switzer; Jessica Bruce; Deidre M Kiefer; Hati Kobusingye; Rebecca Drexler; RaeAnne M Besser; Dennis L Confer; Mary M Horowitz; Roberta J King; Bronwen E Shaw; Suzanna M van Walraven; Lori Wiener; Wendy Packman; James W Varni; Michael A Pulsipher
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2016-08-10       Impact factor: 4.406

10.  Race and ethnicity in decisions about unrelated hematopoietic stem cell donation.

Authors:  Galen E Switzer; Jessica G Bruce; Larissa Myaskovsky; Andrea DiMartini; Diana Shellmer; Dennis L Confer; Linda K Abress; Roberta J King; Allyson G Harnaha; Sibylle Ohngemach; Mary Amanda Dew
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2012-12-20       Impact factor: 22.113

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.