Literature DB >> 12789384

A double-blind, randomised- placebo, controlled, parallel group, multicentre, flexible-dose escalation study to assess the efficacy and safety of sildenafil administered as required to male outpatients with erectile dysfunction in Korea.

H K Choi1, T Y Ahn, J J Kim, S C Kim, J S Paick, J K Suh, H S Kim, Y K Kim, W H Lee, B H Oh, C H Park, W S Ryu, T G Chung, S W Kim, W H Lee, D G Moon, D S Ryu, K K Seo, D K Kim, D S Lee.   

Abstract

The efficacy and safety of sildenafil was evaluated in a randomiSed, double-blind, placebo-controlled, flexible-dose study in Korean men aged 28-78 y with erectile dysfunction (ED) of broad-spectrum aetiology and more than 6 months duration. A total of 133 patients were randomised at six centres in Korea to receive either sildenafil (50 mg initially, increased if necessary to l00 mg or decreased to 25 mg depending on efficacy and tolerance) (n=66) or matching placebo (n=67) taken on an 'as needed' basis l h prior to anticipated sexual activity for a period of 8 weeks. At the end of this time, the primary efficacy variables relating to the achievement and maintenance of erections sufficient for sexual intercourse, and the secondary efficacy variables, which included: (1) the five separate domains of sexual functioning of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) scale, (2) the percentage of successful intercourse attempts, and (3) a global assessment of erections, were all statistically significantly improved by sildenafil in comparison with placebo (P&amp;<0.0001). Treatment-related adverse events occurred in 56.1% of patients receiving sildenafil and 20.9% receiving placebo. The most common adverse events with sildenafil were vasodilatation (flushing), headache and abnormalities in colour vision (31.8, 22.7 and 6.1% of patients, respectively), and most were mild in nature. The efficacy and safety of sildenafil in this population of Korean men appears similar to that reported in other studies in western populations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12789384     DOI: 10.1038/sj.ijir.3900944

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Impot Res        ISSN: 0955-9930            Impact factor:   2.896


  6 in total

Review 1.  Erectile dysfunction.

Authors:  Mohit Khera; Irwin Goldstein
Journal:  BMJ Clin Evid       Date:  2011-06-29

Review 2.  Prevalence and medical management of erectile dysfunction in Asia.

Authors:  Kwangsung Park; Eu Chang Hwang; Sun-Ouck Kim
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2011-04-04       Impact factor: 3.285

3.  Efficacy and safety of tadalafil taken as needed for the treatment of erectile dysfunction in Asian men: results of an integrated analysis.

Authors:  Ying-Lu Guo; Vijay P Viswanathan; Han-Sun Chiang; Hyung Ki Choi; Andrew Wai Chun Yip; Wei Shen; Vladimir Kopernicky
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2009-04-20       Impact factor: 3.285

Review 4.  Indirect comparison of interventions using published randomised trials: systematic review of PDE-5 inhibitors for erectile dysfunction.

Authors:  R Andrew Moore; Sheena Derry; Henry J McQuay
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2005-12-14       Impact factor: 2.264

Review 5.  Korean Society for Sexual Medicine and Andrology (KSSMA) Guideline on Erectile Dysfunction.

Authors:  Ji Kan Ryu; Kang Su Cho; Su Jin Kim; Kyung Jin Oh; Sung Chul Kam; Kyung Keun Seo; Hong Seok Shin; Soo Woong Kim
Journal:  World J Mens Health       Date:  2013-08-31       Impact factor: 5.400

6.  Efficacy of Continuous Dosing of Tadalafil Once Daily vs Tadalafil On Demand in Clinical Subgroups of Men With Erectile Dysfunction: A Descriptive Comparison Using the Integrated Tadalafil Databases.

Authors:  Gerald Brock; Xiao Ni; Matthias Oelke; John Mulhall; Matt Rosenberg; Allen Seftel; Deborah D'Souza; Jane Barry
Journal:  J Sex Med       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 3.802

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.