OBJECTIVES: Our purpose was to conduct a longitudinal investigation of xerostomia and salivary gland hypofunction in a national cohort of HIV-positive and at-risk HIV-negative participants in the Women's Interagency HIV Study. Study design. Data included responses to a dry mouth questionnaire, clinical evaluations of major salivary glands, and unstimulated and chewing-stimulated whole salivary flow rates. Repeated measures regression models were used to determine factors associated with xerostomia and salivary gland hypofunction. RESULTS: Significant univariate associations were found between HIV status and reports of "too little saliva" (P <.0001), < or = 0.1 mL/min, unstimulated saliva (P =.01), and lack of saliva upon palpation of parotid (P =.02) and submandibular/sublingual salivary glands (P =.03). Adjusted odds of reports of "too little saliva" were significantly higher for HIV-positive participants (odds ratio [OR] = 2.44; 95% CI, 1.49 - 3.97; P =.0004) than for HIV-negative participants. Among HIV-positive women, adjusted odds of reports of "too little saliva" and of < or = 0.7 mL/min chewing-stimulated saliva were significantly higher for those with CD4 < 200 (OR = 1.58; 95% CI, 1.07-2.34; P =.022; and OR = 1.53; 95% CI, 1.05-2.23; P =.027, respectively) and for those with CD4 200-500 (OR = 1.47; 95%CI, 1.07-2.02; P = 0.016; and OR = 1.37; 95% CI, 1.01-2.31; P =.001, respectively) than for those with CD4 > 500. Also, adjusted odds of < or = 0.1mL/min unstimulated saliva and < or = 0.7 mL/min chewing-stimulated saliva were significantly higher in women on highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) (OR = 1.25; 95% CI, 1.05 - 1.50; P =.014) than in women not on HAART (OR = 1.34; 95% CI, 1.01 - 1.79; P =.044). CONCLUSIONS: HIV-positive women are at a significantly higher risk for xerostomia and salivary gland hypofunction than HIV-negative women, and low CD4 cell counts and HAART use are significant risk factors for these conditions.
OBJECTIVES: Our purpose was to conduct a longitudinal investigation of xerostomia and salivary gland hypofunction in a national cohort of HIV-positive and at-risk HIV-negative participants in the Women's Interagency HIV Study. Study design. Data included responses to a dry mouth questionnaire, clinical evaluations of major salivary glands, and unstimulated and chewing-stimulated whole salivary flow rates. Repeated measures regression models were used to determine factors associated with xerostomia and salivary gland hypofunction. RESULTS: Significant univariate associations were found between HIV status and reports of "too little saliva" (P <.0001), < or = 0.1 mL/min, unstimulated saliva (P =.01), and lack of saliva upon palpation of parotid (P =.02) and submandibular/sublingual salivary glands (P =.03). Adjusted odds of reports of "too little saliva" were significantly higher for HIV-positive participants (odds ratio [OR] = 2.44; 95% CI, 1.49 - 3.97; P =.0004) than for HIV-negative participants. Among HIV-positive women, adjusted odds of reports of "too little saliva" and of < or = 0.7 mL/min chewing-stimulated saliva were significantly higher for those with CD4 < 200 (OR = 1.58; 95% CI, 1.07-2.34; P =.022; and OR = 1.53; 95% CI, 1.05-2.23; P =.027, respectively) and for those with CD4 200-500 (OR = 1.47; 95%CI, 1.07-2.02; P = 0.016; and OR = 1.37; 95% CI, 1.01-2.31; P =.001, respectively) than for those with CD4 > 500. Also, adjusted odds of < or = 0.1mL/min unstimulated saliva and < or = 0.7 mL/min chewing-stimulated saliva were significantly higher in women on highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) (OR = 1.25; 95% CI, 1.05 - 1.50; P =.014) than in women not on HAART (OR = 1.34; 95% CI, 1.01 - 1.79; P =.044). CONCLUSIONS: HIV-positive women are at a significantly higher risk for xerostomia and salivary gland hypofunction than HIV-negative women, and low CD4 cell counts and HAART use are significant risk factors for these conditions.
Authors: M Navazesh; R Mulligan; R Karim; W J Mack; S Ram; H Seirawan; J Greenspan; D Greenspan; J Phelan; M Alves Journal: Oral Dis Date: 2008-11-11 Impact factor: 3.511
Authors: Jair C Leao; Camila M B Ribeiro; Alessandra A T Carvalho; Cristina Frezzini; Stephen Porter Journal: Clinics (Sao Paulo) Date: 2009-05 Impact factor: 2.365