Literature DB >> 12788504

Evaluation of methods for eliciting somatosensory-evoked potentials in the awake, freely moving rat.

Peter J Stienen1, Zainal L Haberham, Walter E van den Brom, Harry N M de Groot, Anjop J Venker-Van Haagen, Ludo J Hellebrekers.   

Abstract

To standardise the method of eliciting somatosensory-evoked potentials (SEPs), SEPs were generated by electrical stimulation of different stimulus sites and recorded bilaterally from the primary somatosensory cortex (S1) and from midline in awake, freely moving rats. Increasing stimulus intensity enhanced amplitudes of all SEPs. At supramaximal stimulation, SEPs following vibrissae and tail stimulation (V-SEP and Ta-SEP, respectively) but not following trunk stimulation (Tr-SEP), fulfilled our criterion of signal-to-noise ratio >or=4. The first V-SEP component coincided with a stimulus artefact, disqualifying these recordings for a standard stimulation protocol. The Ta-SEP generated stable and reproducible recordings and was considered to be the preferred technique. Early components of the contralateral S1 recorded V-SEP and Tr-SEP occurred at latencies different from the other recordings. Increasing stimulus repetition rate (SRR) decreased amplitudes of all SEPs. At the highest obtainable SRR, the amplitude between the V-SEP second positive and second negative components in all recordings was 70-80% of the amplitude at 0.1 Hz, whereas peak amplitudes of subsequent components and those of the Tr-SEP and Ta-SEP were 20-50%. These results indicate that the different SEP components might be generated by different ascending neural pathways.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12788504     DOI: 10.1016/s0165-0270(03)00070-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci Methods        ISSN: 0165-0270            Impact factor:   2.390


  3 in total

1.  Somatosensory evoked potentials in the telencephalon of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) following galvanic stimulation of the tail.

Authors:  Janicke Nordgreen; Tor Einar Horsberg; Birgit Ranheim; Andrew C N Chen
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2007-11-07       Impact factor: 1.836

2.  Nociception and conditioned fear in rats: strains matter.

Authors:  Manon W H Schaap; Hugo van Oostrom; Arie Doornenbal; José van 't Klooster; Annemarie M Baars; Saskia S Arndt; Ludo J Hellebrekers
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-23       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Evoked potentials in the Atlantic cod following putatively innocuous and putatively noxious electrical stimulation: a minimally invasive approach.

Authors:  Stian Ludvigsen; Niels C Stenklev; Helge K Johnsen; Einar Laukli; Dagfinn Matre; Øyvind Aas-Hansen
Journal:  Fish Physiol Biochem       Date:  2013-07-30       Impact factor: 2.794

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.