Literature DB >> 12788112

The relation between depression and anxiety: an evaluation of the tripartite, approach-withdrawal and valence-arousal models.

Stewart A Shankman1, Daniel N Klein.   

Abstract

Epidemiological studies have consistently reported that depressive and anxiety disorders co-occur frequently. This paper reviews the evidence for three models that have been proposed to explain the relation between these two conditions-the tripartite, the approach-withdrawal, and valence-arousal models. Specifically, we focus on predictions that the three models generate for cross-sectional studies, prospective and family/twin studies of personality, and EEG studies. In sum, no model was strongly supported across all types of studies, though specific aspects of each model were. Because of the heterogeneity of depression and anxiety disorders, a model with 2-4 factors or dimensions may not be sufficient to explain the relation between the two conditions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12788112     DOI: 10.1016/s0272-7358(03)00038-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Psychol Rev        ISSN: 0272-7358


  56 in total

1.  Regulatory Focus and Anxiety: A Self-Regulatory Model of GAD-Depression Comorbidity.

Authors:  Megan M Klenk; Timothy J Strauman; E Tory Higgins
Journal:  Pers Individ Dif       Date:  2011-05-01

2.  Affective traits and history of depression are related to ventral striatum connectivity.

Authors:  Sophie R DelDonno; Lisanne M Jenkins; Natania A Crane; Robin Nusslock; Kelly A Ryan; Stewart A Shankman; K Luan Phan; Scott A Langenecker
Journal:  J Affect Disord       Date:  2017-06-15       Impact factor: 4.839

3.  Neurophysiological correlates of induced discrete emotions in humans: an individually oriented analysis.

Authors:  L I Aftanas; N V Reva; L N Savotina; V P Makhnev
Journal:  Neurosci Behav Physiol       Date:  2006-02

4.  Effects of alexithymia on the activity of the anterior and posterior areas of the cortex of the right hemisphere in positive and negative emotional activation.

Authors:  L I Aftanas; A A Varlamov
Journal:  Neurosci Behav Physiol       Date:  2007-01

5.  Biomarkers of threat and reward sensitivity demonstrate unique associations with risk for psychopathology.

Authors:  Brady D Nelson; Sarah Kate McGowan; Casey Sarapas; E Jenna Robison-Andrew; Sarah E Altman; Miranda L Campbell; Stephanie M Gorka; Andrea C Katz; Stewart A Shankman
Journal:  J Abnorm Psychol       Date:  2013-08

6.  Comparing the validity of informant and self-reports of personality using laboratory indices of emotional responding as criterion variables.

Authors:  Lynne Lieberman; Huiting Liu; Ashley A Huggins; Andrea C Katz; Michael J Zvolensky; Stewart A Shankman
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2016-06-08       Impact factor: 4.016

7.  Personality and emotional processing: A relationship between extraversion and the late positive potential in adolescence.

Authors:  Brittany C Speed; Brady D Nelson; Greg Perlman; Daniel N Klein; Roman Kotov; Greg Hajcak
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2015-04-05       Impact factor: 4.016

8.  The structure of anxiety and depression in a normative sample of younger and older Australian adolescents.

Authors:  Phillip J Tully; Ian T Zajac; Anthony J Venning
Journal:  J Abnorm Child Psychol       Date:  2009-07

Review 9.  Reward devaluation: Dot-probe meta-analytic evidence of avoidance of positive information in depressed persons.

Authors:  E Samuel Winer; Taban Salem
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2015-11-30       Impact factor: 17.737

10.  Agreement Between Self- and Informant-Reported Ratings of Personality Traits: The Moderating Effects of Major Depressive and/or Panic Disorder.

Authors:  Lynne Lieberman; Stephanie M Gorka; Ashley A Huggins; Andrea C Katz; Casey Sarapas; Stewart A Shankman
Journal:  J Nerv Ment Dis       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 2.254

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.