Literature DB >> 12787987

Plantar soft tissue loading under the medial metatarsals in the standing diabetic foot.

Amit Gefen1.   

Abstract

Diabetes mellitus (type 2) is the most frequent cause of non-traumatic lower-limb amputations. The major cause of impairment to the feet of diabetics is persistent hyperglycemia, potentially leading to peripheral neuropathy as well as to pathological changes in plantar soft tissue, which stiffen its structure and diminish its ability to effectively distribute foot-ground contact loads. In this study, a computational model of the foot structure in the standing position was utilized to evaluate stress distributions in plantar soft tissue under the medial metatarsal heads of simulated diabetic versus normal feet. The model comprises five anatomic planar cross-sections in the directions of the foot rays, which were solved for internal stresses under static ankle joint reaction (300 N) and triceps surae muscle forces (150 N) using the finite element method. Tissues were assumed to be homogenous, isotropic and elastic materials, with nonlinear stress-strain relations for the ligaments, fascia and plantar tissue. The model revealed significant tension stress concentrations (90-150 KPa) in the plantar pad of the simulated diabetic forefoot: they were four times the normal maximum stress under the first metatarsal head and almost eight times the normal maximum stress under the second metatarsal head. It was shown that with increased severity of stiffening of the plantar pad, as related to glucose-exposure, peak forefoot contact stresses may rise by 38 and 50% under the first and second metatarsal heads, respectively. The increase in averaged (von Mises) internal stresses within the plantar soft tissue is even more pronounced, and may rise by 82 and 307% for the tissue under the first and second metatarsal heads, respectively. These results, which conform to experimental data gathered over the last two decades, suggest that the process of injury in diabetic feet is very likely to initiate not on the skin surface, but in deeper tissue layers, and the tissues underlying the distal bony prominences of the medial metatarsals are the most vulnerable ones.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12787987     DOI: 10.1016/s1350-4533(03)00029-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Eng Phys        ISSN: 1350-4533            Impact factor:   2.242


  39 in total

1.  [Diffusion of ulcers in the diabetic foot is promoted by stiffening of plantar muscular tissue under excessive bone compression].

Authors:  A Gefen; E Linder-Ganz
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  Biomechanical evaluation of tenodesis reconstruction in ankle with deltoid ligament deficiency: a finite element analysis.

Authors:  Can Xu; Ming-Yan Zhang; Guang-Hua Lei; Can Zhang; Shu-Guang Gao; Wen Ting; Kang-Hua Li
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-11-11       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Biomechanical behavior of plantar fat pad in healthy and degenerative foot conditions.

Authors:  Chiara Giulia Fontanella; Federica Nalesso; Emanuele Luigi Carniel; Arturo N Natali
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2015-08-14       Impact factor: 2.602

4.  Effect of footwear and orthotic devices on stress reduction and soft tissue strain of the neuropathic foot.

Authors:  Donovan J Lott; Mary K Hastings; Paul K Commean; Kirk E Smith; Michael J Mueller
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2006-12-19       Impact factor: 2.063

5.  Pressure gradient and subsurface shear stress on the neuropathic forefoot.

Authors:  Donovan J Lott; Dequan Zou; Michael J Mueller
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2007-12-03       Impact factor: 2.063

6.  Motion characteristics of the medial and lateral longitudinal arch during landing.

Authors:  Mako Fukano; Toru Fukubayashi
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2008-11-08       Impact factor: 3.078

7.  Optimization of nonlinear hyperelastic coefficients for foot tissues using a magnetic resonance imaging deformation experiment.

Authors:  Marc Petre; Ahmet Erdemir; Vassilis P Panoskaltsis; Thomas A Spirka; Peter R Cavanagh
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 2.097

8.  Computer simulation of stress distribution in the metatarsals at different inversion landing angles using the finite element method.

Authors:  Y D Gu; X J Ren; J S Li; M J Lake; Q Y Zhang; Y J Zeng
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2009-08-15       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  A comparison of lower limb EMG and ground reaction forces between barefoot and shod gait in participants with diabetic neuropathic and healthy controls.

Authors:  Isabel C N Sacco; Paula M H Akashi; Ewald M Hennig
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2010-02-03       Impact factor: 2.362

10.  Prediction of peak pressure from clinical and radiological measurements in patients with diabetes.

Authors:  Nick A Guldemond; Pieter Leffers; Geert H I M Walenkamp; Nicolaas C Schaper; Antal P Sanders; Fred H M Nieman; Lodewijk W van Rhijn
Journal:  BMC Endocr Disord       Date:  2008-12-02       Impact factor: 2.763

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.