OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effect of three distinct hormone replacement therapy regimens on mammography. METHODS:121 postmenopausal women who had never received or were past users of hormone replacement therapy were studied prospectively. Women with an intact uterus were randomly allocated either to conjugated equine estrogens 0.625 mg plus medroxyprogesteroneacetate 5 mg (CEE/MPA, n=34) or to 17beta-estradiol 2 mg plus norethisterone acetate 1 mg (E(2)/NETA, n=35). Hysterectomized women received CEE 0.625 mg (CEE, n=25). Women who either declined or did not qualify for treatment served as controls (n=27). Treatment was continuous and the study period lasted 12 months. Main outcome measures were the changes according to Wolfe classification between baseline and 12-month-mammograms. RESULTS: No increase in breast density was identified in any of the women in the control group. Two women (8%) in the CEE group showed an increase in breast density. Four women (11.8%) in the CEE/MPA and 11 women (31.4%) in the E(2)/NETA group revealed an increase in breast density. No woman in the therapy groups showed an involution of fibroglandular tissue while seven women (25.9%) in the control group exhibited involution of breast parenchyma. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that hormone replacement therapy may suspend breast involution but does not increase breast density in the majority of patients. In the minority of patients who show a density increase, the magnitude of this increase varies according to the regimen employed.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effect of three distinct hormone replacement therapy regimens on mammography. METHODS: 121 postmenopausal women who had never received or were past users of hormone replacement therapy were studied prospectively. Women with an intact uterus were randomly allocated either to conjugated equine estrogens 0.625 mg plus medroxyprogesterone acetate 5 mg (CEE/MPA, n=34) or to 17beta-estradiol 2 mg plus norethisterone acetate 1 mg (E(2)/NETA, n=35). Hysterectomized women received CEE 0.625 mg (CEE, n=25). Women who either declined or did not qualify for treatment served as controls (n=27). Treatment was continuous and the study period lasted 12 months. Main outcome measures were the changes according to Wolfe classification between baseline and 12-month-mammograms. RESULTS: No increase in breast density was identified in any of the women in the control group. Two women (8%) in the CEE group showed an increase in breast density. Four women (11.8%) in the CEE/MPA and 11 women (31.4%) in the E(2)/NETA group revealed an increase in breast density. No woman in the therapy groups showed an involution of fibroglandular tissue while seven women (25.9%) in the control group exhibited involution of breast parenchyma. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that hormone replacement therapy may suspend breast involution but does not increase breast density in the majority of patients. In the minority of patients who show a density increase, the magnitude of this increase varies according to the regimen employed.
Authors: N Tentolouris; G Christodoulakos; I Lambrinoudaki; E Mandalaki; C Panoulis; C Maridaki; G Creatsas; N Katsilambros Journal: J Endocrinol Invest Date: 2005-04 Impact factor: 4.256