Literature DB >> 12787457

Changes in properties of polyacid-modified composite resins (compomers) following storage in acidic solutions.

J W Nicholson1, E Gjorgievska, B Bajraktarova, M A McKenzie.   

Abstract

The interaction of three polyacid-modified composite resins (compomers) with various acidic storage solutions, and also water, over periods of time up to 6 months has been studied and compared with those of a glass-ionomer and a composite resin. This interaction has been shown to vary in a complex way with length of storage and nature of the acid, and citric acid was found to be the most aggressive storage medium for glass-ionomer cement, and also for the compomers. The pure composite resin, by contrast, was relatively unaffected by all of the acid solutions examined. In all acids, the compomers showed a distinct buffering effect, i.e. they increased the pH towards neutral, as did the glass-ionomer. The extent of this also varied with duration of storage and nature of the acid. The biaxial flexure strength was determined and found to be essentially unaffected by the complex chemical interactions with acidic storage solutions. Values obtained for the compomers were lower than those of the composite resin, but above those of the glass-ionomer. Fourier-transform infrared (FT-IR) spectroscopy was employed to study the changes in the compomers following storage in the aqueous media, but bands were broad and no detailed assignments could be made. There were changes in the region of the spectra associated with metal carboxylates however, and this indicates that the secondary acid-base reaction had occurred following water uptake.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12787457     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2842.2003.01041.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Rehabil        ISSN: 0305-182X            Impact factor:   3.837


  6 in total

1.  Microleakage in Class V composite and compomer restorations following exposure to a colutory prescribed for the treatment of xerostomy.

Authors:  Ascensión Vicente; Antonio J Ortiz; Pablo L Parra; José L Calvo; Fernando Chiva
Journal:  Odontology       Date:  2011-01-27       Impact factor: 2.634

2.  Comparative Evaluation of Shear Bond Strength of Luting Cements to Different Core Buildup Materials in Lactic Acid Buffer Solution.

Authors:  Siddharam M Patil; Vikas B Kamble; Raviraj G Desai; Kashinath C Arabbi; Ved Prakash
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2015-08-01

3.  Comparison of the Influence of a Packaged Fruit Juice on the Bacterial Adhesion on a Glass Ionomer Cement and an Esthetic Restorative Material In Vitro.

Authors:  Alok Patel; Sayali P Belsare; Shweta S Jajoo; Smita Patil; Sanket Kunte; Shweta Chaudhary
Journal:  Int J Clin Pediatr Dent       Date:  2022 May-Jun

4.  Microhardness Evaluation of Microhybrid Versus Nanofilled Resin Composite After Exposure to Acidic Drinks.

Authors:  Dalia M Abouelmagd; Rasha R Basheer
Journal:  J Int Soc Prev Community Dent       Date:  2022-06-29

5.  Marginal adaptation and performance of bioactive dental restorative materials in deciduous and young permanent teeth.

Authors:  Elizabeta Gjorgievska; John W Nicholson; Snezana Iljovska; Ian J Slipper
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2008 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.698

6.  Surface hardness evaluation of different composite resin materials: influence of sports and energy drinks immersion after a short-term period.

Authors:  Ugur Erdemir; Esra Yildiz; Meltem Mert Eren; Sevda Ozel
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2013 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.698

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.