Literature DB >> 12787260

Comparative pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of intravenous and oral nefopam in healthy volunteers.

Guy Aymard1, Dominique Warot, Pierre Démolis, Jean François Giudicelli, Philippe Lechat, Marie Emmanuelle Le Guern, Christine Alquier, Bertrand Diquet.   

Abstract

To determine the pharmacokinetic, subjective effects of a single 20 mg dose of nefopam administered either intravenously or orally in healthy volunteers, twenty-four healthy Caucasian men received 20 mg nefopam orally+placebo intravenous infusion and placebo orally+intravenous infusion of 20 mg nefopam with one week interval, in a double-blind, double-dummy cross-over study. Nefopam and desmethyl-nefopam plasma concentrations were measured by HPLC with UV detection up to 48 hr after drug administration. Self-rating questionnaires (Mood and vigilance Visual Analogue Scales, Addiction Research Centre Inventory) and drug safety were investigated. The F value (bioavailability) of the parent drug was 0.36+/-0.13. The AUCoral/AUCiv ratio of nefopam+desmethyl-nefopam was 0.62+/-0.23. The half-life of nefopam was similar whether administered orally (5.1+/-1.3 hr) or intravenously (5.1+/-0.6 hr). The half-life of desmethyl-nefopam was two to three times longer than that of the parent molecule (orally: 10.6+/-3.0 versus 5.1+/-1.3 hr, P<10(-4) and intravenously: 15.0+/-2.4 versus 5.1+/-0.6 hr, P<10(-4)). As assessed by the Addiction Research Centre Inventory, no evidence of abuse liability in healthy, drug-naive volunteers was observed. On visual analogue scales, volunteers rated themselves as more drowsy, less alert, less energetic and less anxious after oral compared to intravenous administration. The AUC0-->24 hr of anxiety and energy parameters were not different after oral and intravenous administration: 90+/-142 versus 35+/-84 (P=0.27) and 66+/-74 versus 46+/-54 mm x hr (P=0.36), respectively. The AUC0-->24 hr of drowsiness and alertness parameters were significantly greater after oral than after intravenous administration: 68+/-65 versus 27+/-30 (P=0.005) and 54+/-63 versus 28+/-48 mm x hr (P=0.03), respectively. A clockwise hysteresis loop was observed for drowsiness in 16 out of 24 volunteers after oral administration. The results suggest that in healthy volunteers desmethyl-nefopam may contribute to the pharmacodynamic effects of single dose nefopam solution administered orally. This study shows a rather low bioavailability of nefopam given in intravenous solution when administered orally. Nevertheless, when the main metabolite desmethyl-nefopam is taken into account, the ratio of the areas under the curves is almost doubled.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12787260     DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0773.2003.920605.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacol Toxicol        ISSN: 0901-9928


  10 in total

1.  Identifying mechanism-of-action targets for drugs and probes.

Authors:  Elisabet Gregori-Puigjané; Vincent Setola; Jérôme Hert; Brenda A Crews; John J Irwin; Eugen Lounkine; Lawrence Marnett; Bryan L Roth; Brian K Shoichet
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-06-18       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  A Simultaneous Mixed-Effects Pharmacokinetic Model for Nefopam, N-desmethylnefopam, and Nefopam N-Oxide in Human Plasma and Urine.

Authors:  Aravind Mittur
Journal:  Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 2.441

3.  Understanding the hysteresis loop conundrum in pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic relationships.

Authors:  Christopher Louizos; Jaime A Yáñez; M Laird Forrest; Neal M Davies
Journal:  J Pharm Pharm Sci       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 2.327

4.  Population pharmacokinetics of nefopam in elderly, with or without renal impairment, and its link to treatment response.

Authors:  Zoubir Djerada; Aurélie Fournet-Fayard; Claire Gozalo; Chantal Lelarge; Denis Lamiable; Hervé Millart; Jean-Marc Malinovsky
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 4.335

5.  Nefopam prescribing preferences in French hospitals: results of a survey.

Authors:  Thomas Schulz; Laure Lalande; Frederic Aubrun; Mikhail Dziadzko
Journal:  Pan Afr Med J       Date:  2022-03-15

6.  The analgesic effect of nefopam combined with low dose remifentanil in patients undergoing middle ear surgery under desflurane anesthesia: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Jung Young Yoo; Byung Gun Lim; Heezoo Kim; Myoung-Hoon Kong; Il-Ok Lee; Nan Sook Kim
Journal:  Korean J Anesthesiol       Date:  2015-01-28

7.  Development and statistical optimization of nefopam hydrochloride loaded nanospheres for neuropathic pain using Box-Behnken design.

Authors:  S Sukhbir; S Yashpal; A Sandeep
Journal:  Saudi Pharm J       Date:  2015-03-25       Impact factor: 4.330

8.  The Effect of Nefopam Infusion during Laparascopic Cholecystectomy on Postoperative Pain.

Authors:  Eun Mi Kim; Joo Hyun Jeon; Mi Hwa Chung; Eun Mi Choi; Seung Hwa Baek; Pil Hyun Jeon; Mi Hyeon Lee
Journal:  Int J Med Sci       Date:  2017-05-05       Impact factor: 3.738

9.  Intranasal niosomes of nefopam with improved bioavailability: preparation, optimization, and in-vivo evaluation.

Authors:  Heba A Abou-Taleb; Rasha A Khallaf; Jelan A Abdel-Aleem
Journal:  Drug Des Devel Ther       Date:  2018-10-17       Impact factor: 4.162

10.  The effect of modulated electro-hyperthermia on the pharmacokinetic properties of nefopam in healthy volunteers: A randomised, single-dose, crossover open-label study.

Authors:  Sun Young Lee; Min-Gul Kim
Journal:  Int J Hyperthermia       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 3.914

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.