Literature DB >> 12787187

Evaluating change in health care practice: lessons from three studies.

Sally Redfern1, Sara Christian, Ian Norman.   

Abstract

Implementation and evaluation of evidence-based practice are high on the policy agenda in the UK National Health Service. Over the last 30 years evaluation of practice in the health services has moved from a (medical) profession-led mode to a politically and managerially led mode in which objectives are pre-set by those who legitimate and fund the services. Against this background we describe three recent evaluations of nursing practice as examples to illustrate challenges encountered when evaluating changes in practice developments in health care. If evaluations are to contribute to improvements in practice, a shift is needed from an over-reliance on one-off outcome evaluations to those that have a cumulative component and take account of context and process as well as outcome. The merits of realistic evaluation are suggested as a solution to the methodological limitations of traditional approaches and to developing generalizable theory.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12787187     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2753.2003.00387.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Eval Clin Pract        ISSN: 1356-1294            Impact factor:   2.431


  5 in total

1.  A realistic evaluation: the case of protocol-based care.

Authors:  Jo Rycroft-Malone; Marina Fontenla; Debra Bick; Kate Seers
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2010-05-26       Impact factor: 7.327

2.  Case management in primary care for frequent users of healthcare services with chronic diseases and complex care needs: an implementation and realist evaluation protocol.

Authors:  Catherine Hudon; Maud-Christine Chouinard; Kris Aubrey-Bassler; Frederick Burge; Shelley Doucet; Vivian R Ramsden; Magaly Brodeur; Paula L Bush; Yves Couturier; Marie-France Dubois; Line Guénette; France Légare; Paul Morin; Thomas G Poder; Marie-Ève Poitras; Pasquale Roberge; Ruta Valaitis; Shirley Bighead; Cameron Campbell; Martine Couture; Breanna Davis; Élaine Deschenes; Lynn Edwards; Sarah Gander; Gilles Gauthier; Patricia Gauthier; Richard J Gibson; Julie Godbout; Geneviève Landry; Christine Longjohn; Norma Rabbitskin; Denis A Roy; Judy Roy; Véronique Sabourin; Tara Sampalli; Amanda Saulnier; Claude Spence; Jennifer Splane; Mike Warren; Joanne Young; Pierre Pluye
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-11-25       Impact factor: 2.692

3.  Barriers to the sustainability of an intervention designed to improve patient engagement within NHS mental health rehabilitation units: a qualitative study nested within a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Melanie Lean; Gerard Leavey; Helen Killaspy; Nicholas Green; Isobel Harrison; Sarah Cook; Thomas Craig; Frank Holloway; Maurice Arbuthnott; Michael King
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 3.630

4.  Conditions for production of interdisciplinary teamwork outcomes in oncology teams: protocol for a realist evaluation.

Authors:  Dominique Tremblay; Nassera Touati; Danièle Roberge; Jean-Louis Denis; Annie Turcotte; Benoît Samson
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2014-06-17       Impact factor: 7.327

5.  Waiting time reduction in intravitreal clinics by optimization of appointment scheduling: balancing demand and supply.

Authors:  Marta Ugarte
Journal:  BMJ Qual Improv Rep       Date:  2015-06-19
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.