Literature DB >> 12787171

A critical appraisal of evidence-based medicine: some ethical considerations.

M Gupta1.   

Abstract

Evidence-based medicine (EBM) is a concept that has grown to dominate the medical literature over the last decade. EBM has provoked a variety of criticisms, scientific, philosophical and sociological. However, while its basic conclusion--that we should practise EBM--is ethical, there has been limited ethical analysis of EBM. This paper aims to provide an analysis of EBM from an ethical perspective and identify some of EBM's potential ethical implications. Following a description of what constitutes EBM, this paper will identify and assess some of the basic values and epistemological assumptions of EBM that provide support for the moral duty to practise EBM. It will then examine potential ethical implications that could arise from practising EBM, given the challenges that have been made of EBM's assumptions and claims to authority. This paper will conclude by arguing that practitioners could strengthen the ethics of EBM by embracing a broader definition of evidence and including ethical criteria in the critical appraisal of research studies.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12787171     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2753.2003.00382.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Eval Clin Pract        ISSN: 1356-1294            Impact factor:   2.431


  11 in total

1.  An "education for life" requirement to promote lifelong learning in an internal medicine residency program.

Authors:  Mukta Panda; Norman A Desbiens
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2010-12

Review 2.  Evaluation of clinical appropriateness of blood transfusion.

Authors:  Franco Verlicchi
Journal:  Blood Transfus       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 3.443

3.  Rationality versus reality: the challenges of evidence-based decision making for health policy makers.

Authors:  Deirdre McCaughey; Nealia S Bruning
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2010-05-26       Impact factor: 7.327

Review 4.  Evidence-based medicine: why do opponents and proponents use the same arguments?

Authors:  A Gerber; K W Lauterbach
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  2005-03

5.  Ethics and evidence-based medicine: is there a conflict?

Authors:  Erich H Loewy
Journal:  MedGenMed       Date:  2007-08-06

6.  Defining and Designing Mixed Research Synthesis Studies.

Authors:  Margarete Sandelowski; Corrine I Voils; Julie Barroso
Journal:  Res Sch       Date:  2006

7.  The Successful Return-To-Work Questionnaire for Cancer Survivors (I-RTW_CS): Development, Validity and Reproducibility.

Authors:  Michiel A Greidanus; Angela G E M de Boer; Angelique E de Rijk; Sonja Brouwers; Theo M de Reijke; Marie José Kersten; Jean H G Klinkenbijl; Roy I Lalisang; Robert Lindeboom; Patricia J Zondervan; Monique H W Frings-Dresen; Sietske J Tamminga
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 3.883

8.  Balancing health care evidence and art to meet clinical needs: policymakers' perspectives.

Authors:  Louise E Parker; Mona J Ritchie; Joann E Kirchner; Richard R Owen
Journal:  J Eval Clin Pract       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 2.431

9.  Towards a new definition of return-to-work outcomes in common mental disorders from a multi-stakeholder perspective.

Authors:  Hiske L Hees; Karen Nieuwenhuijsen; Maarten W J Koeter; Ute Bültmann; Aart H Schene
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-06-29       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Perceptions, attitudes and knowledge of evidence-based medicine in primary care in Spain: a study protocol.

Authors:  Pablo Alonso-Coello; Ivan Solà; Rafael Rotaeche; Ana Isabel González; Mercè Marzo-Castillejo; Arturo Louro-González; Ricard Carrillo; Paola Velázquez; Guillermo García-Velasco; Carlos Calderón
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2009-05-15       Impact factor: 2.655

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.