Literature DB >> 12785627

Boston Naming Test: problems with administration and scoring.

Michael N Lopez1, Griselda P Arias, Marnie A Hunter, Richard A Charter, Reda R Scott.   

Abstract

The poorly written administration and scoring instructions for the Boston Naming Test allow too wide a range of interpretations. Three different, seemingly correct interpretations of the scoring methods were compared. The results show that these methods can produce large differences in the total score.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12785627     DOI: 10.2466/pr0.2003.92.2.468

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Rep        ISSN: 0033-2941


  2 in total

1.  Normative Data for Derived Measures and Discrepancy Scores for the Uniform Data Set 3.0 Neuropsychological Battery.

Authors:  Paulina V Devora; Samantha Beevers; Andrew M Kiselica; Jared F Benge
Journal:  Arch Clin Neuropsychol       Date:  2019-01-24       Impact factor: 2.813

2.  Remembering a name: Neuropsychological validity studies and a computer proposal for detection of anomia.

Authors:  Nora Silvana Vigliecca; Javier Alfredo Voos
Journal:  Dement Neuropsychol       Date:  2019 Oct-Dec
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.