Literature DB >> 12785023

Foam-sclerotherapy, surgery, sclerotherapy, and combined treatment for varicose veins: a 10-year, prospective, randomized, controlled, trial (VEDICO trial).

G Belcaro1, M R Cesarone, A Di Renzo, R Brandolini, L Coen, G Acerbi, C Marelli, B M Errichi, M Malouf, K Myers, D Christopoulos, A Nicolaides, G Geroulakos, S Vasdekis, E Simeone, A Ricci, I Ruffini, S Stuard, E Ippolito, P Bavera, M Georgiev, M Corsi, M Scoccianti, U Cornelli, N Caizzi, M Dugall, D Christopoulos, M Veller, R Venniker, M Cazaubon, M Griffin.   

Abstract

The study compared, by a prospective, randomized method, 6 treatment options: A: Sclerotherapy; B: High-dose sclerotherapy; C: Multiple ligations; D: Stab avulsion; E: Foam-sclerotherapy; F: Surgery (ligation) followed by sclerotherapy. Results were analyzed 10 years after inclusion and initial treatment. Endpoints of the study were variations in ambulatory venous pressure (AVP), refilling time (RT), presence of duplex-reflux, and number of recurrent or new incompetent venous sites. The number of patients, limbs, and treated venous segments were comparable in the 6 treatment groups, also comparable for age and sex distribution. The occurrence of new varicose veins at 5 years varied from 34% for group F (surgery + sclero) and ligation (C) to 44% for the foam + sclero group (E) and 48% for group A (dose 1 sclero). At 10 years the occurrence of new veins varied from 37% in F to 56% in A. At inclusion AVP was comparable in the different groups. At 10 years the decrease in AVP and the increase in RT (indicating decrease in reflux), was generally comparable in the different groups. Also at 10 years the number of new points of major incompetence was comparable in all treatment groups. These results indicate that, when correctly performed, all treatments may be similarly effective. "Standard," low-dose sclerotherapy appears to be less effective than high-dose sclero and foam-sclerotherapy which may obtain, in selected subjects, results comparable to surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12785023     DOI: 10.1177/000331970305400306

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Angiology        ISSN: 0003-3197            Impact factor:   3.619


  7 in total

Review 1.  Varicose veins.

Authors:  Paul Tisi
Journal:  BMJ Clin Evid       Date:  2007-10-18

Review 2.  Varicose veins.

Authors:  Paul V Tisi
Journal:  BMJ Clin Evid       Date:  2011-01-05

Review 3.  Endovenous ablation therapy (laser or radiofrequency) or foam sclerotherapy versus conventional surgical repair for short saphenous varicose veins.

Authors:  Sharath Chandra Vikram Paravastu; Margaret Horne; P Dominic F Dodd
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-11-29

Review 4.  Injection sclerotherapy for varicose veins.

Authors:  Ricardo de Ávila Oliveira; Rachel Riera; Vladimir Vasconcelos; Jose Cc Baptista-Silva
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-12-10

Review 5.  A review of the current management and treatment options for superficial venous insufficiency.

Authors:  Henry T Zhan; Ruth L Bush
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  Treatment of varicose veins.

Authors:  Raha Nael; Suman Rathbun
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2009-04

Review 7.  Surgery versus sclerotherapy for the treatment of varicose veins.

Authors:  K A Rigby; S J Palfreyman; C Beverley; J A Michaels
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2004-10-18
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.