Literature DB >> 12784846

Transgenic animal technology: alternatives in genotyping and phenotyping.

Carl A Pinkert1.   

Abstract

Over the past decade, breakthrough technologies in transgenic animal technology and functional genomics have played a central role in the explosive growth of rodent modeling and in scientific innovation. Various noninvasive alternatives to routine surgical biopsy have been described for genotypic and phenotypic analyses of laboratory animals. A number of options are available to refine or replace potentially painful and invasive procedures ranging from tissue biopsies (including tail biopsies and toe docking) to several blood sampling techniques. Unfortunately, adoption of many non- or minimally invasive alternatives has proven difficult on a number of fronts ranging from historical reservations to procedural expectations and actual experimental productivity. Similarly, a variety of phenotyping considerations have addressed throughput efficiencies and the health and well being of research animals. From an animal welfare perspective, marked increases in laboratory animal populations have accompanied rapid advancements spanning the life sciences. As described for rodent modeling, but with applications across many laboratory animal species, diverse procedural refinements are available that will readily aid in the analysis of whole animal models. Ultimately, non-invasive technologies and complementary refinements have bearing on the quality and reproducibility of data that are reported, as well as of critical importance to the well being and ethical management of animals at all developmental stages: from fetal existence, to the neonatal period, and on through adulthood.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12784846

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Comp Med        ISSN: 1532-0820            Impact factor:   0.982


  7 in total

1.  Developmental and behavioral effects of toe clipping on neonatal and preweanling mice with and without vapocoolant anesthesia.

Authors:  Lee-Ronn Paluch; Christine C Lieggi; Magali Dumont; Sebastien Monette; Elyn R Riedel; Neil S Lipman
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 1.232

2.  An Efficient, Simple, and Noninvasive Procedure for Genotyping Aquatic and Nonaquatic Laboratory Animals.

Authors:  Morihiro Okada; Thomas C Miller; Julia Roediger; Yun-Bo Shi; Joseph Mat Schech
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 1.232

Review 3.  Mitochondrial biology in reproduction.

Authors:  Matthew V Cannon; Kumiko Takeda; Carl A Pinkert
Journal:  Reprod Med Biol       Date:  2011-08-03

4.  Evaluation of common anesthetic and analgesic techniques for tail biopsy in mice.

Authors:  Carissa P Jones; Scott Carver; Lon V Kendall
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 1.232

5.  Evaluation of tail biopsy collection in laboratory mice (Mus musculus): vertebral ossification, DNA quantity, and acute behavioral responses.

Authors:  F Claire Hankenson; Laura M Garzel; David D Fischer; Bonnie Nolan; Kurt D Hankenson
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 1.232

6.  Differential requirement for Src family tyrosine kinases in the initiation, progression, and metastasis of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Irwin H Gelman; Jennifer Peresie; Kevin H Eng; Barbara A Foster
Journal:  Mol Cancer Res       Date:  2014-07-22       Impact factor: 5.852

7.  NDUFS4: creation of a mouse model mimicking a Complex I disorder.

Authors:  Christopher A Ingraham; Lindsay S Burwell; Jolanta Skalska; Paul S Brookes; Robert L Howell; Shey-Shing Sheu; Carl A Pinkert
Journal:  Mitochondrion       Date:  2009-02-11       Impact factor: 4.160

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.