Literature DB >> 12784830

Contrasting two accounts of anxiety-linked attentional bias: selective attention to varying levels of stimulus threat intensity.

Edward Wilson1, Colin MacLeod.   

Abstract

Previous research has established that clinical anxiety patients and nonclinical populations with high levels of anxiety vulnerability characteristically orient attention toward moderately threatening stimuli. In contrast, populations with low levels of anxiety vulnerability typically orient attention away from such stimuli. The differing experimental predictions generated by 2 classes of hypothetical explanation for this anxiety-linked attentional discrepancy were tested, using attentional probe methodology to compare the attentional responses of high and low trait anxious individuals to facial stimuli of differing threat intensities. The results support the view that all individuals orient attention away from mildly threatening stimuli and toward strongly threatening stimuli, with differences in anxiety vulnerability reflecting the intensity of stimulus threat required to elicit the attentional vigilance response.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12784830     DOI: 10.1037/0021-843x.112.2.212

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Abnorm Psychol        ISSN: 0021-843X


  35 in total

1.  Relationship between cognitive factors and anxiety in individuals with irritable bowel syndrome.

Authors:  Nagisa Sugaya; Shinobu Nomura; Hironori Shimada
Journal:  Int J Behav Med       Date:  2012-09

Review 2.  Neurocognitive mechanisms of gaze-expression interactions in face processing and social attention.

Authors:  Reiko Graham; Kevin S Labar
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2012-01-24       Impact factor: 3.139

3.  Intersubject variability in fearful face processing: the link between behavior and neural activation.

Authors:  Tracy J Doty; Shruti Japee; Martin Ingvar; Leslie G Ungerleider
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 3.282

4.  Attachment anxiety moderates the relationship between childhood maltreatment and attention bias for emotion in adults.

Authors:  Jennifer S Davis; Negar Fani; Kerry Ressler; Tanja Jovanovic; Erin B Tone; Bekh Bradley
Journal:  Psychiatry Res       Date:  2014-03-13       Impact factor: 3.222

Review 5.  The dot-probe task to measure emotional attention: A suitable measure in comparative studies?

Authors:  Rianne van Rooijen; Annemie Ploeger; Mariska E Kret
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-12

Review 6.  Mechanisms of attentional biases towards threat in anxiety disorders: An integrative review.

Authors:  Josh M Cisler; Ernst H W Koster
Journal:  Clin Psychol Rev       Date:  2009-12-14

7.  Linking Process and Outcome in the Study of Emotion and Aging.

Authors:  Derek M Isaacowitz; Fredda Blanchard-Fields
Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci       Date:  2012-01-05

8.  For whom the bell tolls: Neurocognitive individual differences in the acute stress-reduction effects of an attention bias modification game for anxiety.

Authors:  Tracy A Dennis-Tiwary; Laura J Egan; Sarah Babkirk; Samantha Denefrio
Journal:  Behav Res Ther       Date:  2015-12-18

9.  Reduced habituation to angry faces: increased attentional capture as to override inhibition of return.

Authors:  Carolina Pérez-Dueñas; Alberto Acosta; Juan Lupiáñez
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2013-05-21

10.  Lateral prefrontal cortex mediates the cognitive modification of attentional bias.

Authors:  Michael Browning; Emily A Holmes; Susannah E Murphy; Guy M Goodwin; Catherine J Harmer
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2009-12-24       Impact factor: 13.382

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.