Literature DB >> 12784382

Most patients receiving routine care for rheumatoid arthritis in 2001 did not meet inclusion criteria for most recent clinical trials or american college of rheumatology criteria for remission.

Tuulikki Sokka1, Theodore Pincus.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the proportion of 2 cohorts of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in Nashville, Tennessee, who met 4 common criteria for inclusion in clinical trials: > or = 6 swollen joints, > or = 6 tender joints, erythrocyte sedimentation rate > or = 28 mm/h, and/or morning stiffness > or = 45 min.
METHODS: Two cohorts of patients with RA, all of whom had met American Rheumatism Association (ARA) [now American College of Rheumatology (ACR)] criteria for RA at some time, were studied. Cohort L (late) included 146 consecutive patients whose mean disease duration was 14.0 years and who had been under care at a weekly academic rheumatology clinic for a mean of 6.2 years when seen in 1998-2001. Cohort E (early) included 232 patients of 5 private practice rheumatologists whose symptoms began in 1998 or later and whose mean disease duration was 1.8 years when seen in 2001. Patients were reviewed for the 4 inclusion criteria as well as 6 ARA remission criteria.
RESULTS: In Cohort L, on a 28 joint count, 42.5% of patients had > or = 6 swollen joints, 25.3% had > or = 6 tender joints, 19.9% had both > or = 6 swollen and > or = 6 tender joints, 25.0% had ESR > or = 28, and 45.9% had morning stiffness > or = 45 min. In Cohort E, on a 42 joint count, 63.4% of patients had > or = 6 swollen joints, 50.4% had > or = 6 tender joints, 38.8% had both > or = 6 swollen and > or = 6 tender joints, 49.3% had ESR > or = 28, and 50.9% had morning stiffness > or = 45 min. Overall, 15.3% of Cohort L and 34.1% of Cohort E patients had > or = 6 swollen and tender joints, as well as an ESR > or = 28 or morning stiffness > or = 45 min. Only 4.1% of Cohort L and no patient in Cohort E met ARA criteria for remission.
CONCLUSION: The majority of patients seen in routine care in these 2 cohorts did not meet criteria for inclusion in most contemporary RA clinical trials, including clinical trials sponsored by pharmaceutical companies to introduce new drugs or biological agents. Few of these patients met ARA criteria for remission. Controlled trial data are not available concerning results of treatment with new biological agents or disease modifying antirheumatic drugs in a large proportion, if not a majority, of patients with RA at this time.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12784382

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Rheumatol        ISSN: 0315-162X            Impact factor:   4.666


  29 in total

Review 1.  Swedish registers to examine drug safety and clinical issues in RA.

Authors:  J Askling; C M Fored; P Geborek; L T H Jacobsson; R van Vollenhoven; N Feltelius; S Lindblad; L Klareskog
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2006-01-13       Impact factor: 19.103

2.  Treating rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Paul Emery; Tore K Kvien
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2007-07-14

3.  Serum calprotectin may reflect inflammatory activity in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis despite normal to low C-reactive protein.

Authors:  Jana Hurnakova; Hana Hulejova; Jakub Zavada; Martin Komarc; Lucie Andres Cerezo; Herman Mann; Jiri Vencovsky; Karel Pavelka; Ladislav Senolt
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2018-04-14       Impact factor: 2.980

4.  Declines in number of tender and swollen joints in patients with rheumatoid arthritis seen in standard care in 1985 versus 2001: possible considerations for revision of inclusion criteria for clinical trials.

Authors:  T Pincus; T Sokka; C P Chung; G Cawkwell
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2005-12-08       Impact factor: 19.103

5.  Biologic therapies and infections in the daily practice of three Italian rheumatologic units: a prospective, observational study.

Authors:  Paola Cipriani; Onorina Berardicurti; Francesco Masedu; Francesca D'Onofrio; Luca Navarini; Piero Ruscitti; Nicola Maruotti; Domenico Paolo Emanuele Margiotta; Vasiliki Liakouli; Paola Di Benedetto; Francesco Carubbi; Marco Valenti; Francesco Paolo Cantatore; Antonella Afeltra; Roberto Giacomelli
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2016-10-25       Impact factor: 2.980

Review 6.  Should contemporary rheumatoid arthritis clinical trials be more like standard patient care and vice versa?

Authors:  T Pincus; T Sokka
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 19.103

7.  Progression of radiographic joint damage in different eras: trends towards milder disease in rheumatoid arthritis are attributable to improved treatment.

Authors:  A Finckh; H K Choi; F Wolfe
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2006-03-15       Impact factor: 19.103

8.  Tumor necrosis factor antagonist responsiveness in a United States rheumatoid arthritis cohort.

Authors:  Jeffrey D Greenberg; Mitsumasa Kishimoto; Vibeke Strand; Stanley B Cohen; Thomas P Olenginski; Thomas Harrington; Shelly P Kafka; George Reed; Joel M Kremer
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 4.965

9.  Acupuncture for symptom management of rheumatoid arthritis: a pilot study.

Authors:  Hyangsook Lee; Ji-Young Lee; Yun-Ju Kim; Sehyun Kim; Changshik Yin; Jae-Ho Khil; Kirok Kwon; Sun-Mi Choi; Hyejung Lee; Hi-Joon Park
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2008-01-10       Impact factor: 2.980

Review 10.  Using Registry Data to Understand Disease Evolution in Inflammatory Myositis and Other Rheumatic Diseases.

Authors:  Lily Siok Hoon Lim; Brian M Feldman
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2019-12-12       Impact factor: 4.592

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.