BACKGROUND: Cyclooxygenases regulate the production of prostaglandins and play a role in tumor development and progression. The authors investigated the prognostic impact of expression of the cyclooxygenase (COX) isoforms, COX-1 and COX-2, on disease-free survival and progression-free survival in patients with primary breast carcinoma as well as the association between COX expression and other clinicopathologic parameters. METHODS: In this study COX isoform expression was determined by immunohistochemistry in a cohort of 221 patients with primary breast carcinoma. RESULTS: Expression of COX-2 was detected in 36% of breast carcinoma samples and was associated significantly with several clinicopathologic parameters, including positive lymph node status (P < 0.0005), larger tumor size (P < 0.0005), poor differentiation (P < 0.0005), vascular invasion (P = 0.03), and negative estrogen receptor status (P = 0.04). In contrast, COX-1 was expressed in 45% of tumors and was associated with smaller tumor size (P = 0.02) and with negative lymph node status (P = 0.01). In a univariate survival analysis, a significant association was observed between elevated COX-2 expression and decreases in disease-free survival (P = 0.0007) and overall survival (P = 0.02). In a multivariate analysis, expression of COX-2 was of borderline significance for disease-free survival (relative risk, 1.90; 95% confidence interval, 1.00-3.59), adjusting for tumor size, histologic grade, number of positive lymph nodes, and patient age. Elevated expression of COX-1 in tumor tissue had no statistically significant influence on patient prognosis. CONCLUSIONS: The current data suggest that increased expression of COX-2 may play a role in the progression of primary breast carcinoma. It remains to be investigated whether treatment with selective inhibitors of COX-2 may be an additional therapeutic option for patients with breast carcinoma. Copyright 2003 American Cancer Society.
BACKGROUND: Cyclooxygenases regulate the production of prostaglandins and play a role in tumor development and progression. The authors investigated the prognostic impact of expression of the cyclooxygenase (COX) isoforms, COX-1 and COX-2, on disease-free survival and progression-free survival in patients with primary breast carcinoma as well as the association between COX expression and other clinicopathologic parameters. METHODS: In this study COX isoform expression was determined by immunohistochemistry in a cohort of 221 patients with primary breast carcinoma. RESULTS: Expression of COX-2 was detected in 36% of breast carcinoma samples and was associated significantly with several clinicopathologic parameters, including positive lymph node status (P < 0.0005), larger tumor size (P < 0.0005), poor differentiation (P < 0.0005), vascular invasion (P = 0.03), and negative estrogen receptor status (P = 0.04). In contrast, COX-1 was expressed in 45% of tumors and was associated with smaller tumor size (P = 0.02) and with negative lymph node status (P = 0.01). In a univariate survival analysis, a significant association was observed between elevated COX-2 expression and decreases in disease-free survival (P = 0.0007) and overall survival (P = 0.02). In a multivariate analysis, expression of COX-2 was of borderline significance for disease-free survival (relative risk, 1.90; 95% confidence interval, 1.00-3.59), adjusting for tumor size, histologic grade, number of positive lymph nodes, and patient age. Elevated expression of COX-1 in tumor tissue had no statistically significant influence on patient prognosis. CONCLUSIONS: The current data suggest that increased expression of COX-2 may play a role in the progression of primary breast carcinoma. It remains to be investigated whether treatment with selective inhibitors of COX-2 may be an additional therapeutic option for patients with breast carcinoma. Copyright 2003 American Cancer Society.
Authors: Fredika M Robertson; Ann-Marie Simeone; Anthony Lucci; John S McMurray; Sukhen Ghosh; Massimo Cristofanilli Journal: Cancer Date: 2010-06-01 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Nagehan Ozdemir Barısık; Sevinc Hallac Keser; Aylin Ege Gul; Sibel Sensu; Nilufer Onak Kandemir; Hasan Fehmi Kucuk; Mahmut Gumus; Nimet Karadayı Journal: Med Oncol Date: 2010-03-31 Impact factor: 3.064
Authors: Dae Sung Cho; Hee Jae Joo; Dong Keun Oh; Ji Hun Kang; Young Soo Kim; Kyi Beom Lee; Se Joong Kim Journal: Yonsei Med J Date: 2005-02-28 Impact factor: 2.759