Literature DB >> 12783959

Anterior inferotemporal neurons of monkeys engaged in object recognition can be highly sensitive to object retinal position.

James J DiCarlo1, John H R Maunsell.   

Abstract

Visual object recognition is computationally difficult because changes in an object's position, distance, pose, or setting may cause it to produce a different retinal image on each encounter. To robustly recognize objects, the primate brain must have mechanisms to compensate for these variations. Although these mechanisms are poorly understood, it is thought that they elaborate neuronal representations in the inferotemporal cortex that are sensitive to object form but substantially invariant to other image variations. This study examines this hypothesis for image variation resulting from changes in object position. We studied the effect of small differences (+/-1.5 degrees ) in the retinal position of small (0.6 degrees wide) visual forms on both the behavior of monkeys trained to identify those forms and the responses of 146 anterior IT (AIT) neurons collected during that behavior. Behavioral accuracy and speed were largely unaffected by these small changes in position. Consistent with previous studies, many AIT responses were highly selective for the forms. However, AIT responses showed far greater sensitivity to retinal position than predicted from their reported receptive field (RF) sizes. The median AIT neuron showed a approximately 60% response decrease between positions within +/-1.5 degrees of the center of gaze, and 52% of neurons were unresponsive to one or more of these positions. Consistent with previous studies, each neuron's rank order of target preferences was largely unaffected across position changes. Although we have not yet determined the conditions necessary to observe this marked position sensitivity in AIT responses, we rule out effects of spatial-frequency content, eye movements, and failures to include the RF center. To reconcile this observation with previous studies, we hypothesize that either AIT position sensitivity strongly depends on object size or that position sensitivity is sharpened by extensive visual experience at fixed retinal positions or by the presence of flanking distractors.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12783959     DOI: 10.1152/jn.00358.2002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  67 in total

1.  Higher level visual cortex represents retinotopic, not spatiotopic, object location.

Authors:  Julie D Golomb; Nancy Kanwisher
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2011-12-20       Impact factor: 5.357

2.  Probing principles of large-scale object representation: category preference and location encoding.

Authors:  Radoslaw Martin Cichy; Philipp Sterzer; Jakob Heinzle; Lloyd T Elliott; Fernando Ramirez; John-Dylan Haynes
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2012-02-27       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Shape encoding consistency across colors in primate V4.

Authors:  Brittany N Bushnell; Anitha Pasupathy
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-06-06       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Characterizing responses of translation-invariant neurons to natural stimuli: maximally informative invariant dimensions.

Authors:  Michael Eickenberg; Ryan J Rowekamp; Minjoon Kouh; Tatyana O Sharpee
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  2012-06-26       Impact factor: 2.026

5.  Invariant Visual Object and Face Recognition: Neural and Computational Bases, and a Model, VisNet.

Authors:  Edmund T Rolls
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2012-06-19       Impact factor: 2.380

6.  High-level visual object representations are constrained by position.

Authors:  Dwight J Kravitz; Nikolaus Kriegeskorte; Chris I Baker
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2010-03-29       Impact factor: 5.357

7.  The visual system supports online translation invariance for object identification.

Authors:  Jeffrey S Bowers; Ivan I Vankov; Casimir J H Ludwig
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-04

Review 8.  The primate working memory networks.

Authors:  Christos Constantinidis; Emmanuel Procyk
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.282

9.  Neural theory for the perception of causal actions.

Authors:  Falk Fleischer; Andrea Christensen; Vittorio Caggiano; Peter Thier; Martin A Giese
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2012-04-26

Review 10.  The emergent executive: a dynamic field theory of the development of executive function.

Authors:  Aaron T Buss; John P Spencer
Journal:  Monogr Soc Res Child Dev       Date:  2014-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.