Literature DB >> 12783135

Pit pattern analysis by magnifying chromoendoscopy for the diagnosis of colorectal polyps.

Hui-Hsiung Liu1, Shin-Ei Kudo, Jyh-Pyng Juch.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: The development of magnifying chromoendoscopy has facilitated the observation of mucosal pit patterns. This study investigated the value of this technology in predicting the histologic findings of colorectal lesions.
METHODS: A total of 954 colorectal polyps were included. After identifying the lesions at colonoscopy, 0.2% indigocarmine solution was sprayed and then the zoom apparatus was switched to make a magnified view of the stained crypt orifice at a maximum 100 times magnification. The observed pit patterns were classified into 6 categories (I, II, IIIL, IIIS, IV, and V) according to Kudo's classification. Type I and II were designated as non-neoplastic patterns whereas other types were neoplastic. Correlation of the pit pattern with the findings of histologic examinations of resected or biopsied polyps was performed.
RESULTS: There were 678 diminutive (</= 5 mm) polyps (71.1%) and 705 neoplastic polyps (73.9%), including 695 adenomas and 10 carcinomas. When comparing histologically confirmed neoplastic lesions to non-neoplastic lesions, prediction of neoplastic lesions by endoscopists based on magnifying chromoendoscopy had a sensitivity of 90.8%, a specificity of 72.7%, a positive predictive value of 90.4%, a negative predictive value of 73.6%, and an overall accuracy of 86.1%. The diagnostic accuracy for neoplastic lesions was not associated with polyp size and location but was related to the operator's experience.
CONCLUSIONS: Characteristic pit patterns obtained by magnifying chromoendoscopy provide useful clues for differentiation of adenomatous from non-adenomatous polyps. Used appropriately in experienced hands, this technique offers a valuable adjunct to standard colonoscopy in predicting the histologic characteristics of colorectal polyps.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12783135

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Formos Med Assoc        ISSN: 0929-6646            Impact factor:   3.282


  13 in total

1.  Magnifying colonoscopy: interobserver agreement in the assessment of colonic pit patterns and its correlation with histopathological findings.

Authors:  Esdras Camargo Andrade Zanoni; Raul Cutait; Marcelo Averbach; Lix Alfredo Reis de Oliveira; Cláudio Rolim Teixeira; Paulo Alberto Falco Pires Corrêa; José Luiz Paccos; Giulio F Rossini; Luiz H Câmara Lopes
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2007-06-20       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 2.  Kudo's pit pattern classification for colorectal neoplasms: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ming Li; Syed Mohsin Ali; Syeda Umm-a-OmarahGilani; Jing Liu; Yan-Qing Li; Xiu-Li Zuo
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-09-21       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Can we accurately diagnose minute gastric cancers (≤5 mm)? Chromoendoscopy (CE) vs magnifying endoscopy with narrow band imaging (M-NBI).

Authors:  Shoko Fujiwara; Kenshi Yao; Takashi Nagahama; K Uchita; Takao Kanemitsu; Kozue Tsurumi; Noritaka Takatsu; Takashi Hisabe; Hiroshi Tanabe; Akinori Iwashita; Toshiyuki Matsui
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2014-07-09       Impact factor: 7.370

4.  Prevalence of advanced colonic polyps in asymptomatic Chinese.

Authors:  Hui-Hsiung Liu; Meng-Chen Wu; Yeh Peng; Ming-Shiang Wu
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2005-08-14       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  Magnifying colonoscopy as a non-biopsy technique for differential diagnosis of non-neoplastic and neoplastic lesions.

Authors:  Shigeharu Kato; Kuang-I Fu; Yasushi Sano; Takahiro Fujii; Yutaka Saito; Takahisa Matsuda; Ikuro Koba; Shigeaki Yoshida; Takahiro Fujimori
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-03-07       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  Invasive pit pattern, macronodule and depression are predictive factors of submucosal invasion in colorectal laterally spreading tumours from a Western population.

Authors:  Heithem Soliman; Bertrand Brieau; Marie-Anne Guillaumot; Sarah Leblanc; Maximilien Barret; Marine Camus; Marie Dior; Benoit Terris; Romain Coriat; Frédéric Prat; Stanislas Chaussade
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2018-10-05       Impact factor: 4.623

7.  Clinical significance of the muscle-retracting sign during colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection.

Authors:  Takashi Toyonaga; Shinwa Tanaka; Mariko Man-I; James East; Wataru Ono; Eisei Nishino; Tsukasa Ishida; Namiko Hoshi; Yoshinori Morita; Takeshi Azuma
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2015-05-05

8.  Intramucosal carcinoma of the appendix arising from traditional serrated adenoma.

Authors:  Carlos Augusto Real Martinez; Júlia Cutovoi; Debora Helena Rossi; Luciana Rodrigues Meirelles; Maria de Lourdes Setsuko Ayrizono; Raquel Franco Leal; Cláudio Saddy Rodrigues Coy
Journal:  Case Rep Surg       Date:  2015-04-22

9.  Diagnostic accuracy of i-scan image enhancement for real-time endoscopic diagnosis of small colorectal polyps: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ben Glover; Nisha Patel; Hutan Ashrafian; Julian Teare
Journal:  Therap Adv Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-12-06       Impact factor: 4.409

10.  Diagnostic efficacy of the Japan Narrow-band-imaging Expert Team and Pit pattern classifications for colorectal lesions: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yu Zhang; Hui-Yan Chen; Xiao-Lu Zhou; Wen-Sheng Pan; Xin-Xin Zhou; Hang-Hai Pan
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-10-28       Impact factor: 5.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.