Literature DB >> 12782982

Risk factors for failure and complications of intradiscal electrothermal therapy: a pilot study.

Steven P Cohen1, Thomas Larkin, Salahadin Abdi, Audrey Chang, Milan Stojanovic.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: A bi-institutional, retrospective clinical data analysis.
OBJECTIVES: To determine risk factors for failure and complications of intradiscal electrothermal therapy, a treatment for discogenic back pain. SUMMARY OF THE BACKGROUND DATA: Intradiscal electrothermal therapy is a relatively new treatment for discogenic back pain. Though previous studies have shown it to be an effective treatment, there are few published studies examining complications and none examining risk factors for failure.
METHODS: The authors treated 79 patients with discogenic back pain using intradiscal electrothermal therapy. Complications were assessed by patient report and, when indicated, further diagnostic testing. Success or failure was determined by visual analogue pain scores at 6-month follow-up. Variables examined for their relationship to failure and complications were age, sex, duration of pain, number of levels heated, smoking history, diabetes, obesity, leg pain, and previous back surgery.
RESULTS: Forty-eight percent of patients reported more than 50% pain relief at their 6-month follow-up. There were eight complications (10%), most of which were self-limited and transient. The only risk factor associated with intradiscal electrothermal therapy failure was obesity (P = 0.01). Whereas 54% of nonobese patients reported good pain relief at 6 months, only one out of 10 obese patients had successful intradiscal electrothermal therapy. The obese patients in our study were more likely to have a complication from intradiscal electrothermal therapy than they were to obtain pain relief.
CONCLUSION: The only risk factor found to be associated with IDET outcome was obesity, which was a strong predictor of failure. Obesity should be considered a relative contraindication to performing IDET.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12782982     DOI: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000067269.31377.6A

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  7 in total

Review 1.  IDET: a critical appraisal of the evidence.

Authors:  Brian J C Freeman
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-07-26       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Pyogenic spondylodiscitis after percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy.

Authors:  Kyeong-Bo Choi; Choon-Dae Lee; Sang-Ho Lee
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2010-11-30

3.  Intradiscal electrothermal treatment for chronic lower back pain patients with internal disc disruption.

Authors:  Si-Young Park; Seong-Hwan Moon; Moon Soo Park; Hak-Sun Kim; Youn-Jin Choi; Hwan-Mo Lee
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2005-08-31       Impact factor: 2.759

Review 4.  Intradiscal electrothermal therapy, percutaneous discectomy, and nucleoplasty: what is the current evidence?

Authors:  Brian J C Freeman; Roshana Mehdian
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2008-01

5.  Clinical outcomes of percutaneous plasma disc coagulation therapy for lumbar herniated disc diseases.

Authors:  Sang Hyun Kim; Sung Chul Kim; Ki Hong Cho
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2012-01-31

6.  Percutaneous Disc Coagulation Therapy (PDCT) comparing with Automated Percutaneous Lumbar Discectomy (APLD) in Patients of Herniated Lumbar Disc Disease: Preliminary Report.

Authors:  Cheon Wook Park; Joo Yong Lee; Woo Jin Choi; Sang Keun Chang
Journal:  Korean J Spine       Date:  2012-09-30

7.  Thermal-Induced Osteonecrosis of Adjacent Vertebra after Intradiscal Electrothermal Therapy.

Authors:  Soonjoon Kim; Sun-Ho Lee; Eun-Sang Kim; Whan Eoh
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2016-12-29
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.