Literature DB >> 12782939

Hematological side-effect profiles of individualized chemotherapy regimen for recurrent ovarian cancer.

Martina Breidenbach1, Daniel T Rein, Thomas Schöndorf, Torsten Schmidt, Ellen König, Markus Valter, Christian M Kurbacher.   

Abstract

The long-term results for patients with recurrent ovarian cancer (ROC) are poor. There is a need to optimize treatment strategies to improve outcome by avoiding ineffective regimens which are often associated with exacerbated side-effects. Individualized chemotherapy regimens guided by a chemosensitivity assay (ATP-tumor chemosensitivity assay) have already been used successfully to direct chemotherapy. Taking the results of this assay into account, application of drug combinations appears more advisable. Here we present a systematic evaluation of toxicities seen with individualized chemotherapy for ROC. A total of 62 patients who received 314 cycles of antineoplastic therapies were evaluated. Three single agents (topotecan, paclitaxel and gemcitabine) and five combinations (cisplatin/gemcitabine, carbopatin/gemcitabine, gemcitabine/treosulfan, mitoxantrone/paclitaxel and carboplatin/paclitaxel) were examined. With respect to myelotoxicity, most single agents except topotecan revealed favorable results in comparison to drug combinations. However, this observation lacks statistical significance. Generally, severe myelosuppression was rare. The highest incidence of leukopenia was seen in regimens with mitoxantrone/paclitaxel or gemcitabine/treosulfan, respectively. Thrombocytopenia accompanied most commonly a topotecan therapy. In the present study combination regimens tend to be more toxic than monotherapies. When response rates are comparable, empirically chosen treatment combination therapies should only be practiced in carefully planned clinical studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12782939     DOI: 10.1097/00001813-200306000-00003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anticancer Drugs        ISSN: 0959-4973            Impact factor:   2.248


  5 in total

1.  The use of treosulfan and gemcitabine in the treatment of platinum-resistant ovarian cancer.

Authors:  S Hilman; P K Koh; S Collins; R Allerton
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2010-01-01       Impact factor: 2.967

2.  Effects of topotecan treatment on nasal, buccal, and lingual mucosa in the rabbit: light and transmission electron microscopic evaluation.

Authors:  Nuray Bayar Muluk; F Figen Kaymaz; A Nur Cakar
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2006-10-25       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 3.  Camptothecin and podophyllotoxin derivatives: inhibitors of topoisomerase I and II - mechanisms of action, pharmacokinetics and toxicity profile.

Authors:  Jörg T Hartmann; Hans-Peter Lipp
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 5.606

4.  A prospective multicenter study of treosulfan in elderly patients with recurrent ovarian cancer: results of a planned safety analysis.

Authors:  Sven Mahner; Gülten Oskay-Özcelik; Elke Heidrich-Lorsbach; Stefan Fuxius; Harald Sommer; Peter Klare; Antje Belau; Birgit Ruhmland; Thomas Heuser; Heinz Kölbl; Susanne Markmann; Jalid Sehouli
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-04-15       Impact factor: 4.553

5.  Cycloart-24-ene-26-ol-3-one, a New Cycloartane Isolated from Leaves of Aglaia exima Triggers Tumour Necrosis Factor-Receptor 1-Mediated Caspase-Dependent Apoptosis in Colon Cancer Cell Line.

Authors:  Kok Hoong Leong; Chung Yeng Looi; Xe-Min Loong; Foo Kit Cheah; Unang Supratman; Marc Litaudon; Mohd Rais Mustafa; Khalijah Awang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-04-12       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.