Literature DB >> 12782938

Treosulfan and gemcitabine in metastatic uveal melanoma patients: results of a multicenter feasibility study.

Claudia Pföhler1, Ian A Cree, Selma Ugurel, Christoph Kuwert, Nikolas Haass, Karsten Neuber, Ulrich Hengge, Pippa G Corrie, Markus Zutt, Wolfgang Tilgen, Uwe Reinhold.   

Abstract

No effective treatment currently exists for metastatic uveal melanoma. However, recent results obtained by an ATP-based tumor chemosensitivity assay have shown consistent activity of treosulfan+gemcitabine in up to 80% of tumor specimens tested. In this study we describe the first clinical results observed with this drug combination at different European centers in patients with metastatic uveal melanoma. Clinical case series of patients with metastatic uveal melanoma were treated with treosulfan+gemcitabine at seven different centers. Fourteen patients, 13 previously untreated and one pretreated with chemoimmunotherapy, were included in the study. Patients received treosulfan+gemcitabine in four different dose regimens. The response rates, progression-free and overall survival, and toxicity were evaluated. The analysis of 14 patients revealed one complete response, three partial responses and a stable disease in eight cases. The objective response rate was 28.6%, the median overall survival was 61 weeks [95% confidence interval (CI) 54-133 weeks], the progression-free survival was 28.5 weeks (95% CI 13-62 weeks) and the 1-year survival rate was 80%. The drugs were well tolerated. The most common side-effects were leuko- and thrombocytopenia. These preliminary results suggest potential therapeutic benefit of treosulfan+gemcitabine treatment in metastatic uveal melanoma and warrant further controlled studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12782938     DOI: 10.1097/00001813-200306000-00002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anticancer Drugs        ISSN: 0959-4973            Impact factor:   2.248


  8 in total

1.  Treosulfan and gemcitabine.

Authors:  Ian A Cree; Michael H Neale; Uwe Reinhold; Christian M Kurbacher
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-02-08       Impact factor: 4.553

2.  Quality of evidence about effectiveness of treatments for metastatic uveal melanoma.

Authors:  James J Augsburger; Zélia M Corrêa; Adeel H Shaikh
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  2008

3.  Clinical evaluation of in vitro chemosensitivity testing: the example of uveal melanoma.

Authors:  P Terheyden; E B Bröcker; J C Becker
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 4.553

4.  Phase I trial combining gemcitabine and treosulfan in advanced cutaneous and uveal melanoma patients.

Authors:  P G Corrie; J Shaw; V J Spanswick; R Sehmbi; A Jonson; A Mayer; R Bulusu; J A Hartley; I A Cree
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2005-06-06       Impact factor: 7.640

Review 5.  Current and emerging treatment options for uveal melanoma.

Authors:  Patricia Rusa Pereira; Alexandre Nakao Odashiro; Li-Anne Lim; Cristina Miyamoto; Paula L Blanco; Macanori Odashiro; Shawn Maloney; Dominique F De Souza; Miguel N Burnier
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-08-22

Review 6.  Systemic treatment of metastatic uveal melanoma: review of literature and future perspectives.

Authors:  Kristina Buder; Anja Gesierich; Götz Gelbrich; Matthias Goebeler
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 4.452

7.  Cisplatin, gemcitabine, and treosulfan in relapsed stage IV cutaneous malignant melanoma patients.

Authors:  J Atzpodien; K Terfloth; M Fluck; M Reitz
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2007-10-30       Impact factor: 7.640

8.  Overall survival after treatment for metastatic uveal melanoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Elina S Rantala; Micaela Hernberg; Tero T Kivelä
Journal:  Melanoma Res       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 3.599

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.