Literature DB >> 12782235

Parameters for quantification of hunger in broiler breeders.

Ingrid C de Jong1, A Sander van Voorst, Harry J Blokhuis.   

Abstract

The commercial restricted feeding programme of broiler breeders has a major negative effect on welfare, as the birds are continuously hungry. Objective parameters of hunger are needed to evaluate new management or feeding systems that may alleviate hunger and thus improve broiler breeder welfare. The aim of this experiment was to develop such parameters. Female broiler breeders (Hybro G), n=10 per treatment, were subjected to different levels of feed restriction and we assumed that we thus induced different levels of hunger. Treatment groups were fed ad libitum and at 90%, 70%, 50%, 35% and 25% of ad libitum. In addition, female broiler breeders that were less intensively selected on growth and food conversion (JA57, n=10 per treatment) were fed ad libitum and at 70% of ad libitum. At 6-7 weeks of age, home pen behaviour, behaviour in the open field and baseline plasma corticosterone, glucose and nonesterified fatty acid (NEFA) concentrations were determined. Thereafter, birds were subjected to the feed intake motivation (FIM) test that measures compensatory feed intake. Linear relationships between the level of restriction and the compensatory feed intake on the first days of the FIM test and the glucose/NEFA ratio were found which indicate that these parameters can be used to quantify the level of hunger. Curvilinear relationships between sitting and standing in the home pen, walking in the open field and level of restriction were found. A third-grade hyperbolic relationship between the level of restriction and the baseline plasma corticosterone concentration was found. Thus, these parameters do not seem to represent a straightforward relation with the level of hunger. Intensive selection on growth and food conversion seems to have affected the behaviour but not the physiological responses to feed restriction, because the JA57 birds responded behaviourally, but not physiologically, different to feed restriction as compared with the Hybro birds.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12782235     DOI: 10.1016/s0031-9384(03)00058-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Physiol Behav        ISSN: 0031-9384


  11 in total

1.  Measuring motivation for appetitive behaviour: food-restricted broiler breeder chickens cross a water barrier to forage in an area of wood shavings without food.

Authors:  Laura M Dixon; Sarah Brocklehurst; Vicky Sandilands; Melissa Bateson; Bert J Tolkamp; Rick B D'Eath
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-07-28       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 2.  Environmental Enrichment for Broiler Breeders: An Undeveloped Field.

Authors:  Anja B Riber; Ingrid C de Jong; Heleen A van de Weerd; Sanna Steenfeldt
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2017-06-09

3.  Optimizing Fluorescein Isothiocyanate Dextran Measurement As a Biomarker in a 24-h Feed Restriction Model to Induce Gut Permeability in Broiler Chickens.

Authors:  Mikayla F A Baxter; Ruben Merino-Guzman; Juan D Latorre; Brittany D Mahaffey; Yichao Yang; Kyle D Teague; Lucas E Graham; Amanda D Wolfenden; Xochitl Hernandez-Velasco; Lisa R Bielke; Billy M Hargis; Guillermo Tellez
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2017-04-19

4.  Growth curve and diet density affect eating motivation, behavior, and body composition of broiler breeders during rearing.

Authors:  J de Los Mozos; A I García-Ruiz; L A den Hartog; M J Villamide
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Effect of Qualitative Feed Restriction in Broiler Breeder Pullets on Stress and Clinical Welfare Indicators.

Authors:  Fernanda M Tahamtani; Hengameh Moradi; Anja B Riber
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2020-06-11

6.  Effect of Feed Restriction on the Behaviour and Welfare of Broiler Chickens.

Authors:  Angela Trocino; Peter White; Francesco Bordignon; Valentina Ferrante; Daniela Bertotto; Marco Birolo; Giulio Pillan; Gerolamo Xiccato
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2020-05-11       Impact factor: 2.752

7.  Food preferences of similarly raised and kept captive dogs and wolves.

Authors:  Akshay Rao; Friederike Range; Kerstin Kadletz; Kurt Kotrschal; Sarah Marshall-Pescini
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-09-20       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  The effect of alternative feeding strategies for broiler breeder pullets: 2. Welfare and performance during lay.

Authors:  A Arrazola; T M Widowski; M T Guerin; E G Kiarie; S Torrey
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2019-12-01       Impact factor: 3.352

9.  Effect of early photostimulation at 15-weeks of age and everyday spin feeding on broiler breeder performance.

Authors:  A P Benson; R H Blocher; Z R Jarrell; C K Meeks; M B Habersang; J L Wilson; A J Davis
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2022-03-24       Impact factor: 4.014

10.  Gastrointestinal distribution of chicken gastrin-cholecystokinin family transcript expression and response to short-term nutritive state.

Authors:  Angus M A Reid; Ian C Dunn
Journal:  Gen Comp Endocrinol       Date:  2017-10-20       Impact factor: 2.822

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.