Literature DB >> 12781882

A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials that compared neoadjuvant chemoradiation and surgery to surgery alone for resectable esophageal cancer.

John D Urschel1, Hari Vasan.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Esophagectomy is a standard treatment for resectable esophageal cancer but relatively few patients are cured. Combining neoadjuvant chemoradiation with surgery may improve survival but treatment morbidity is a concern. We performed a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared the use of neoadjuvant chemoradiation and surgery with the use of surgery alone for esophageal cancer.
METHODS: Medline and manual searches were done to identify all published RCTs that compared neoadjuvant chemoradiation and surgery with surgery alone for esophageal cancer. A random-effects model was used and the odds ratio (OR) was the principal measure of effect. Systematic quantitative review was done for outcomes unique to the neoadjuvant chemoradiation treatment group, such as pathological complete response.
RESULTS: Nine RCTs that included 1,116 patients were selected with quality scores ranging from 1 to 3 (5-point Jadad scale). Odds ratio (95% confidence interval [CI]; P value), expressed as chemoradiation and surgery versus surgery alone (treatment versus control; values <1 favor chemoradiation-surgery arm), was 0.79 (0.59, 1.06; P = 0.12) for 1-year survival, 0.77 (0.56, 1.05; P = 0.10) for 2-year survival, 0.66 (0.47, 0.92; P = 0.016) for 3-year survival, 2.50 (1.05, 5.96; P = 0.038) for rate of resection, 0.53 (0.33, 0.84; P = 0.007) for rate of complete resection, 1.72 (0.96, 3.07; P = 0.07) for operative mortality, 1.63 (0.99, 2.68; P = 0.053) for all treatment mortality, 0.38 (0.23, 0.63; P = 0.0002) for local-regional cancer recurrence, 0.88 (0.55, 1.41; P = 0.60) for distant cancer recurrence, and 0.47 (0.16, 1.45; P = 0.19) for all cancer recurrence. A complete pathological response to chemoradiation occurred in 21% of patients. The 3-year survival benefit was most pronounced when chemotherapy and radiotherapy were given concurrently (OR 0.45, 95% CI 0.26 to 0.79, P = 0.005) instead of sequentially (OR 0.82, 95% CI 0.54 to 1.25, P = 0.36).
CONCLUSIONS: Compared with surgery alone, neoadjuvant chemoradiation and surgery improved 3-year survival and reduced local-regional cancer recurrence. It was associated with a lower rate of esophageal resection, but a higher rate of complete (R0) resection. There was a nonsignificant trend toward increased treatment mortality with neoadjuvant chemoradiation. Concurrent administration of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy was superior to sequential chemoradiation treatment scheduling.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12781882     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9610(03)00066-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg        ISSN: 0002-9610            Impact factor:   2.565


  163 in total

1.  Comparison Between Concurrent Chemoradiation Followed by Surgery vs. Surgery for Locally Advanced Cancer of Esophagus.

Authors:  Binay Thakur; Chun Shan Zhang; Yang Guo; Robin Lama
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2010-11-19       Impact factor: 0.656

2.  Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy could improve survival outcomes for esophageal carcinoma: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Dong-Bin Wang; Xun Zhang; Hong-Li Han; Yi-Jun Xu; Da-Qiang Sun; Zhen-Liang Shi
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2012-06-14       Impact factor: 3.199

3.  Early evaluation of the apoptotic index ratio is useful in predicting the efficacy of chemoradiotherapy in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Jun Sobajima; Kensuke Kumamoto; Norihiro Haga; Junichi Tamaru; Takeo Takahashi; Tatsuya Miyazaki; Hideyuki Ishida
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2011-11-02       Impact factor: 2.967

Review 4.  Neoadjuvant treatment of esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Nicholas P Campbell; Victoria M Villaflor
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-08-14       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 5.  Adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction: incidence, characteristics, and treatment strategies.

Authors:  Shinichi Hasegawa; Takaki Yoshikawa
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2010-07-03       Impact factor: 7.370

Review 6.  Technological advances in radiotherapy for esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Milan Vosmik; Jiri Petera; Igor Sirak; Miroslav Hodek; Petr Paluska; Jiri Dolezal; Marcela Kopacova
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-11-28       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  Chemoradiotherapy in the management of locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma esophagus: is surgical resection required?

Authors:  Sheh Rawat; Gaurav Kumar; Anjali Kakria; Manoj Kumar Sharma; Deepika Chauhan
Journal:  J Gastrointest Cancer       Date:  2013-09

8.  Overall survival analysis of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Faisal A Siddiqui; Katelyn M Atkins; Brian S Diggs; Charles R Thomas; John G Hunter; James P Dolan
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2014-04

9.  Safety and efficacy of esophageal stents preceding or during neoadjuvant chemotherapy for esophageal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Vinayak Nagaraja; Michael R Cox; Guy D Eslick
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2014-04

10.  Clinical response to induction chemotherapy predicts local control and long-term survival in multimodal treatment of patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Michael Stahl; Hansjochen Wilke; Martin Stuschke; Martin K Walz; Ulrich Fink; Michael Molls; J Rüdiger Siewert; Michael Schroeder; Hans-Bruno Makoski; Ulrich Schmidt; Siegfried Seeber; Udo Vanhoefer
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2004-10-05       Impact factor: 4.553

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.