| Literature DB >> 12781472 |
Moacir Paranhos-Silva1, Geraldo G S Oliveira, Eliana A Reis, Rejane M C de Menezes, Octávio Fernandes, Italo Sherlock, Regis B B Gomes, Lain C Pontes-de-Carvalho, Washington L C dos-Santos.
Abstract
In this study, we compare the development of infection and/or disease in Beagle dogs intradermally infected with Leishmania chagasi, in the presence or absence of Lutzomyia longipalpis saliva, with those of intravenously infected animals. Spleen samples of all the animals inoculated with parasites had positive polymerase chain reaction tests for Leishmania DNA. Positive spleen cultures for Leishmania were detected earlier (P < or = 0.018) and were more frequent (five out of the five animals) in intravenously infected animals than in the intradermally infected animals, in presence (two out of the six animals) or absence (three out of the five animals) of salivary gland lysate of L. longipalpis. Significant increase in serum antibodies against Leishmania was observed only in the intravenously infected group (P = 0.004). In addition, dogs with infection confirmed by isolation of amastigotes or detection of parasite DNA were, nevertheless, negative for anti-Leishmania antibodies up to 5 months or more after infection. Only animals of the intravenously infected group developed progressive decreases in hematocrit (Pearson r = -0.8076, P = -0.0026) and hemoglobin (Pearson r = -0.8403, P = 0.0012) during the infection period. No significant difference in the course of infection was observed between groups of intradermally infected animals. The data presented herein confirms that the intradermal inoculation of dogs with Leishmania produces an asymptomatic form of infection. It also fails to show an advantage in using L. longipalpis saliva as an infection-enhancing agent in experimental canine leishmaniasis.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2003 PMID: 12781472 PMCID: PMC7126804 DOI: 10.1016/s0304-4017(03)00132-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Vet Parasitol ISSN: 0304-4017 Impact factor: 2.738
Clinical and laboratory characteristics of the groups of beagle dogs experimentally infected with L. chagasi
| Groups | Infection age (months) | Sex | Positive spleen culture | PCR (spleen) | Body weigh (%) | Lymphoproliferative response to | ||||||||||||
| 9 | 10 | 11 | 13 | |||||||||||||||
| A1 | 24 | M | − | − | − | + | + | 7.3 | 20.4 | |||||||||
| A2 | 26 | M | 9–10, 12 | + | + | − | + | 20.2 | 1.7 | |||||||||
| A3 | 33 | F | − | − | − | − | + | 15.4 | 29.4 | |||||||||
| A4 | 33 | F | − | + | + | + | + | 18.5 | 27.6 | |||||||||
| A5 | 33 | F | 10 | + | + | ND | ND | ND | ND | |||||||||
| A6 | 22 | F | − | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | |||||||||
| Mean and ratios | 29 ± 5 | M2:4F | 2/6 | 15.4 ± 5.7 | ||||||||||||||
|
| ||||||||||||||||||
| B1 | 32 | F | 9 | + | + | + | + | 12.1 | 5.4 | |||||||||
| B2 | 34 | F | − | − | − | + | + | 24.8 | 18.8 | |||||||||
| B3 | 33 | M | 10–13 | + | + | + | + | 7.1 | 1.4 | |||||||||
| B4 | 33 | F | 9, 12 | + | + | + | + | 14.7 | 5.8 | |||||||||
| B5 | 33 | M | − | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | |||||||||
| Mean and ratios | 33 ± 1 | M2:3F | 3/5 | 14.7 ± 7.4 | ||||||||||||||
| Negative control | ||||||||||||||||||
| C1 | 24 | F | − | − | − | − | − | −15.7 | ND | |||||||||
| C2 | 33 | F | − | − | − | − | − | 13 | 5.5 | |||||||||
| C3 | 33 | M | − | − | − | − | − | 16.4 | 5.0 | |||||||||
| C4 | 22 | M | − | − | − | − | − | 19.2 | 0.3 | |||||||||
| C5 | 22 | M | − | − | − | − | − | 31.1 | 65.0 | |||||||||
| Mean and ratios | 27 ± 6 | M3:2F | 0/5 | 12.8 ± 17.3 | ||||||||||||||
|
| ||||||||||||||||||
| D1 | 20 | M | 2–13 | + | + | + | + | 4.9 | 44.8 | |||||||||
| D2 | 33 | F | 2–13 | + | + | + | + | −45.5 | ND | |||||||||
| D3 | 33 | M | 2–7, 9–13 | + | + | + | + | 19.9 | 6.1 | |||||||||
| D4 | 33 | F | 2–4, 6–7, 9–13 | + | + | + | + | −5.5 | 14.5 | |||||||||
| D5 | 24 | F | 1–4, 6–8 | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | |||||||||
| Mean and ratios | 29 ± 6 | M2:3F | 5/5 | −6.55 ± 24.2 | ||||||||||||||
Month after infection.
Expressed as relative (percentual) body weight gain relative to that observed at the beginning of the experiment.
Stimulation index. Polymerase chain reactions are expressed as negative (−) or positive (+) for Leishmania. ND: not determined.
Fig. 2Anti-L. longipalpis salivary gland serum antibodies in dogs before injection with L. chagasi in presence (•) or absence (○) of L. longipalpis SGL. None of the animals had significant levels of antibody in ELISA. The closed square represents the result obtained with a serum from a dog living in an endemic area of leishmaniasis.
Fig. 1Serum anti-Leishmania antibodies in dogs infected with L. chagasi. Curves correspond to the mean values of results obtained from the serum of dogs infected intravenously (intravenous Leishmania), infected intradermally in the presence (intradermal Leishmania+saliva) or in the absence (intradermamal Leishmania) of L. longipalpis SGL, or uninfected (saline). Vertical bars represent the standard error of means.